TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

[TWG Mathilda]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Theres no example where wolf RB protects against Aquisition. Only the PI can do so

Wouldn't a roleblock extend to blocking the role of an aqui?

[TWG Eugene]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Wouldn't a roleblock extend to blocking the role of an aqui?

There is no mentioning of this in the hierarchy of Aquisition. The host would need to clarify, so this is an unknown variable for every single one of us

[TWG Mathilda]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Doesn't make much sense to me that a roleblock wouldn't also block an aqui.

[TWG Mathilda]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

As per front page:

Power Role Hierarchy:

Roleblocker
Nerfed Medic
Cop
Private Investigator
Acquisitioner
Vigi
Wolf Kill

[TWG Mathilda]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Roleblocker is always on top, so to me that says roleblock would block aqui in all cases if they targeted that person.

[TWG Cherry]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

i really don't see why acqui wouldn't be able to be roleblocked what what

the role description certainly doesn't say rb immune, power hierarchy supports being blocked, and there being a pr to specifically block the acqui doesn't really prevent the other blockers from working on it

[TWG Julian]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

considering i was townreading them before, i guess i believe flurry when they say they confused what the blocker does. presumably they got it mixed up with jailer. the setup post has our pr as "blocker" and the wolf pr as "roleblocker" so it's understandable in that respect. probably wasn't a slip

[TWG Julian]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

phil seems pretty interested in getting PRs to claim. chrissy's post reminded me he pushed del to do it at eod, then during this phase he initiated the PR cover posts and also wanted at least the blocker to claim. not sure what to make of it

[TWG Julian]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

phil also only pushed del to claim despite the vote being tied between del and zucker at that point. why say "if you're around del" and not "if you're around del or zucker"?

[TWG Mathilda]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

considering i was townreading them before, i guess i believe flurry when they say they confused what the blocker does. presumably they got it mixed up with jailer. the setup post has our pr as "blocker" and the wolf pr as "roleblocker" so it's understandable in that respect. probably wasn't a slip

I don't buy that happening two games in a row. Plus defending against it right away like that when not being pressured is sus.

[TWG Julian]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

I don't buy that happening two games in a row. Plus defending against it right away like that when not being pressured is sus.

for your first point, it's ffrtwg! anything can happen! for your second point, dora pressured him:

If I am the Nerfed Doctor, then I did nothing.
If I am the Vigi, I shot Punchy because I think there's 1 W in Julian/Punchy.
If I am the Blocker, I blocked Del for obvious reasons.
If I am the PI, I targeted Apollo because he was odd early game.

Melba, Dotty, Apollo and Zucker didn't vote last phase.

So, the only surprising one is Apollo.

Interesting votes:

Chief -> Dora
Punchy -> Chief
Maple -> Apollo
Cherry -> Flurry
Fauna -> Dotty

Uhh why is it obvious to block the assumed cop?

Woops, I thought blocker was a protective role that works like a 2nd doctor.

[TWG Mathilda]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

I'm standing by it being sus

[TWG Chrissy]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

OK I realize where I went wrong with my big post earlier. I read Phil's post as if it should have been "if ur a role and around Del, claim." Insisting it was aimed at the people who voted Del. Instead it might have also been: "if ur a role and around, Del, claim.", only being aimed at Del.

Phil could you clarify what you meant by that if you haven't already? Because I both can't remember if you did and am running out of time to go check; dying computer and school ending and what not, sparkle~

The moral of the story? Commas are important~!

And about my question at the end of "Where's Apollo?", making an addendum. My sense of time is... pretty bad apparently. I thought two days ago (the last time he posted was the 8th, 9:38 PM server time) was a very long time ago game-wise, and that the day started on the NINTH, and not the TENTH. Upon further reading and editing of this post, I realize that EoD isn't 10:00 PM (server time)

Moral of the story #2? Read more carefully AND SLOWLY, Chrissy!

[TWG Chrissy]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

(OK so realized something. the time on this computer is completely different because of daylight saving time. It's 1:26 PM on my chromebook computer, it's 12:26 PM on the server time, my last post was 11:25 AM on the forums timestamp. No wonder why I'm thrown outta wack on that.)

[TWG Isabelle]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Vote Count:
3/12 @ 00:00

00:59 = good
00:00 = bad

==============

Mathilda [1]
Dora

Julian [1]
Agent S

Boomer [3]
Tank, Phil, Fauna

Flurry [1]
Mathilda