TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

[TWG Eugene]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

This is why I never enjoy d0, nothing is really ever that wolfy. Sure you could come up with a reason any post in this thread was made by a wolf, but the real analysis can’t really begin until d1 when connections start to become more apparent.

I’m on the lynch the inactives train. Why sign up if you’re not even going to play?

Agreed 100%. In a 20 person game that filled THIS quickly. There's 0 excuse to not play.

[TWG Flurry]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

wolves would've not targeted Del tho
since Doc is like
always saving Del

agreed on the first part for vigi, if its the second part, the vigi is playing poorly

also, Del is like
definitely roleblocked or the wolves are all in the afks and its the easiest game of our lives

Blocker could have blocked Vigi and that'd be very sad.

[TWG Eugene]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Everyone voting an inactive here is just outright lazy and looking for an easy town read. Disgusting.

Seeing as Zucker posted less than 10 times and was a wolf. Do you still stand by this opinion of yours?

[TWG Eugene]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

to everyone saying they hope there's more posts later, fingers crossed for more interactions, etc: there's not gonna be when we all take that same approach! be the activity you want to see!

I...think I like Julian for this post...But then again I've got like...25+ more pages to read so opinions can change

[TWG Maple]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

If I am the Nerfed Doctor, then I did nothing.
If I am the Vigi, I shot Punchy because I think there's 1 W in Julian/Punchy.
If I am the Blocker, I blocked Del for obvious reasons.
If I am the PI, I targeted Apollo because he was odd early game.

Christ this is a bad fake role post.

[TWG Maple]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Blocker could have blocked Vigi and that'd be very sad.

Damn, I was going to say this, but you beat me to it.

[TWG Flurry]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Well, maybe it's for the best.

[TWG Eugene]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Reminder that there is a 5 post minimum

Just so Xiz is aware,

NOWHERE does it say that there is a minimum post count in the rules of this game, unless all 20 original players were informed of this while receiving their roles.

[TWG Maple]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Everything about that eod was unexpected. As of right now, I believe the cop claim, and I'd like to see what his night check gives us, which I assume is nothing, but still. Also, I'd like to see where they stand and what direction to go from here.

Also, I don't think it's smart for anyone to claim.

[TWG Eugene]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Just so Xiz is aware,

NOWHERE does it say that there is a minimum post count in the rules of this game, unless all 20 original players were informed of this while receiving their roles.

Given the reactions of everyone after Xiz posted this, I'm going to assume we were not aware of this until he said it.

[TWG Eugene]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

If I like inactives, people are going to get controversial about it. That's going to help me read them. It's that simple.

This seems to me like you're trying to figure out WHO people are, rather than finding out their alignment. I don't care who people are, as long as I read them correctly in the context of the game. Seeing as this is an anon game, I don't think meta reading and guessing who's who is gonna get us far

[TWG Flurry]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

I don't want to tell him that I was really just trying to find the alignments.

[TWG Flurry]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Eugene, I just wanted to say; you stop at the weirdest posts.

The Julian post is hardly alignment indicative.
The 5 post minimum thing is not something we can do anything about.
I also don't understand why you would think that it's important for me to find who people are over alignment either.

[TWG Eugene]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

i'm not too concerned about inactives. if they don't post then that means more attention towards me, hahaha!

that being said, if an inactive shows up in the nick of time just to sneak in their bare minimum 5 posts, they're probably a wolf! vigi should shoot em!

I don't want to believe a wolf is stupid enough to draw attention to themselves to a degree such as this... But I've been wrong before

[TWG Eugene]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Eugene, I just wanted to say; you stop at the weirdest posts.

The Julian post is hardly alignment indicative.
The 5 post minimum thing is not something we can do anything about.
I also don't understand why you would think that it's important for me to find who people are over alignment either.

I'm getting caught up and just posting things as I see them and the way I feel about them at the time of which I see them.

Please keep in mind that I'm only on Page 11 right now and haven't read anything up until that point in time, so you'll have to bear with me as I read through the game.