TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Majority of what's been posted is people playing into their characters. I'm more interested in what's to come in the next few hours as people start to get more serious.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
This is garbage though "I took time to re-read the game and make some bs list but then didn't say why I felt any of these things"I took some time, mostly to reread the game.Would equally like to point out this particular post.01) Agent S NULL
02) Apollo TOWN
03) Boomer TOWN
04) Cherry NULL
05) Chief TOWN
06) Del NULL
07) Dora W LEAN
08) Dotty NULL
09) Fauna NULL
10) Flurry TOWN
11) Julian W LEAN
12) Maple NULL
13) Mathilda NULL
14) Melba NULL
15) Molly NULL
16) Phil TOWN
17) Punchy TOWN
18) Rolf NULL
19) Tank TOWN
20) Zucker NULLComment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
my progression, flurry, is that seeing a few people immediately sheep my case worried me. it was a great case, and you should expect nothing less from someone of my caliber, but still!
you're thinking too hard about me! i read the thread, noticed some shit, and posted about it! stop being paranoid! relax!Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
punchy's kinda wolfy! making a big quote post like that is classic wolf behavior! also ruins the thread's feng shui...yuck!Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
chief's read list without justification is weird but not necessarily wolfy as far as i'm concerned! if anything, i'd lean more town on it!Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
I mean your progression before your post. What made you pick these quotes specifically ?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Yes, if you noticed, I also mindmelded with Phil in my post.
I see what you're saying here. Thank you for clarifying, mrmpht. I think if I were to vote an inactive today, I'd be sticking to Del. See my big post for why! I think their post about content in the thread not being relevant up to that point is very short-sighted.We currently have 12 players with less than 15 posts out of 20 players.
This mean that inactives had a much larger pool than there are wolves/acq combined.
At the time I posted what you quoted, it looked even more discouraging.
My point is that you could gun down inactives and just kill townies over and over losing the game before even reaching an acceptable outcome.
I think the ideal way to play this game is to make a giant town circle and lynch everything that's outside of it.
It's a bit sad, but we have to wait things out to artificially help us filter which inactive to vote.
That's part of my conflict toward inactives.
Got it.In my opinion, there was a lot of mindmelding between the three across pages 11 and 12 of the thread that kickstarted a lot of premature thinking and thought processing of what's been thrown down in the thread, and I really liked that. It's moving the town forward in a positive direction for a d0.
Acq was a 10/10 quality joke toss. Don't have really much to contribute on that discussion other than I do have a posting gimmick in-case of acq, and they most likely won't figure it out, sidekick.
This is very inaccurate, and I can tell you skimmed! It seems like you only skimmed the first three pages, and read only the previous two.
This is why I think you've only read the front and back ends of the thread. I don't think this is a wolf tell; it's just lazy!
On what planet are you from? I've written plenty of comics, but I've never seen a read this alien. Is there anything about the post that you didn't like, or are you just going to shrug it off because it's lengthy, mrmpht? I had two of your posts in there and a question reserved directly for you. Check them out!Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Oops! I forgot to answer the other half of Rolf's post for me. I think it's too difficult to call it distancing given the very few posts Apollo has made. They haven't had many interactions with each other. I don't see it as out of the question for them to be partners with this kind of voting though.Comment
Comment