TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Really? I don't see these posts as wishy-washy at all. There's been no less than a full page of posts in a small pond of roleplay, that has so far been cause for structure of some early votes. I agree it's worth keeping an eye on, but wishy-washy myself of whether or not it's alignment indicative because defense options on day 5. Not really a stellar idea that I would consider 100% revolutionary and give them all the credit for, sidekick.not a fan of these two posts from flurry! seems like the kind of vague wishy-washy posts a wolf makes so they'll have plenty of flexibility in defending themselves later on!Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Dotty
I know right, revolutionary vote. oh em gee zus.
Fingers crossed for posts, we were all active to confirm & start a little early, but we can't be active in-thread after 2 days? Must be one heckuva weekend.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
having trouble parsing this last sentence. what are you trying to say?Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
to everyone saying they hope there's more posts later, fingers crossed for more interactions, etc: there's not gonna be when we all take that same approach! be the activity you want to see!Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
I'm trying to say that you mentioned you were not a fan of the first person to point out del and dotty being inactive and wanting to start putting vote towards inactive, but it's not really a revolutionary idea from one single person that should be paid attention to, given that multiple people are on-board with testing the inactives.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Hard to be the activity I want to see when it's only the two of us, and Rolf here! Ma ha ha ha howr!Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
okay, i understand now. much appreciated!I'm trying to say that you mentioned you were not a fan of the first person to point out del and dotty being inactive and wanting to start putting vote towards inactive, but it's not really a revolutionary idea from one single person that should be paid attention to, given that multiple people are on-board with testing the inactives.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
So would you think that somebody posting in a obvious and blatant gimmick to avoid being targeted would be leaning more wolfy then?
If voting for people posting less is what's going to happen here this phase, I'd avoid Del because of this for now. Would be weird to draw attention onto yourself like this questioning that vote.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
this is true...
well, if it's just us, my dear neighbor, let me ask you what your take on apollo pushing the acquisitioner read on you is. where'd he get it from? why's he repeatedly calling attention to it?Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Maple can you stop? Whatever that gimmick is trying to be, it's not funny and has nothing to do with Animal Crossing roleplay. Can you choose a different gimmick if avoiding the acquisitioner is the goal.
Whoever is talking like that, if you continue I am going to assume you have that weird adult baby/diaper fetish. That is how those people talk.
The game is only anonymous for now!Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
The main idea is that lynching inactives help wolves in this specific setup because they just need to post like 2 times or more to be fine.
It's also making the acquisitioner's life harder by reducing their pool of targets.
So, I was wondering if being pro inactive would go against the wolf agenda and motivate them to defend the stance that inactives must be gone.
I'm curious about how others approach this.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Vote Count:
Phase ends 3/9 @ 00:00
==============
Maple [1]
Boomer
Zucker [1]
Chief
Tank [1]
Punchy
Apollo [1]
Maple
Cherry [1]
Tank
Del [1]
Molly
Mathilda [1]
Phil
Dotty [2]
Fauna, Agent S
Molly [1]
JulianLast edited by TWG Isabelle; 03-8-2020, 02:08 PM.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Every "W" is a "R" with Maple. That's all you need to know.Maple can you stop? Whatever that gimmick is trying to be, it's not funny and has nothing to do with Animal Crossing roleplay. Can you choose a different gimmick if avoiding the acquisitioner is the goal.
Whoever is talking like that, if you continue I am going to assume you have that weird adult baby/diaper fetish. That is how those people talk.
The game is only anonymous for now!Comment
Comment