TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

[inDheart]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

Barring anything crazy, I'm voting within my hot take today, as one of their flips will hopefully solve that trio for me.

no

bad

[roundbox]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

Barring anything crazy, I'm voting within my hot take today, as one of their flips will hopefully solve that trio for me.

um
c'mon maaan

[the sun fan]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

T-Force c'mon dog you aren't this kind of player

you aren't bad for suspecting me or anyone else, or even all three of us, you're allowed to do that

centering your entire game around a 3 man wolfteam and not budging from it is just like

you're staking the game on being right off of a theory that is, in your world, at best, plausible

its exceedingly unlikely for you to have the game solved. Lynching within a group like this to test a theory is just... a waste honestly

[benguino]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

fun fact: I still need to read through the rest of sunfan's posts

ben's post left me underwhelmed, probably because of the sour taste in my mouth about speculating about why FG was killed and why Gradiant wasn't killed at all. I did like the logic about the people he voted for (and them being nervous about being sniffed out), but the nature of this speculation gets us nowhere. he also admits it's a stretch so....
he makes a very unclear case about agreeing with star about wnb, but really just says it "sounds genuine" which doesn't really mean anything
his read on sunfan is based off of what happened to him as well as agreeing with MML, which doesn't really show much work on his behalf
yes I realize that last statement is a bit hypocritical by way of my admission but it looks lame

I disagree that it gets us "nowhere". It's not like the night kills are determined by wolf's rolling some dice, there is usually motivation behind the actions of the wolves. Usually this leaves us with finitely many options, some much more plausible than others. The reason I think it is helpful is because when I make a read, I want to make sure it holds some level of consistency with plausible set of wolf night actions.

As for "being a stretch", I only meant that for WnB. I do feel strongly that MML is likely town because of it and I feel strongly that the analysis is inconclusive for both myself and star-cross.

[inDheart]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

what about eod0 makes him villagery?
is there any person that stands out as a potential partner in the world raeko is wolfing?

how a villager died opposite to him, and there was little shakeup in the wagons suggesting wolves didn't need to save him
was thinking blind when i wrote that

[TWGma]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

suckit.dx

[roundbox]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

your post doesn't really answer this voting reason, as I can tell

you assert here that the kitb missed, therefore wnb is a wolf
you say in your other post that you felt "something wasn't rubbing right" about wnb

do you actually believe that the kitb missing makes wnb a wolf here, or is it your "not rubbing right"? or both?

hey blind I see you
can you answer this last question?

[TWGma]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

Is it a bad play? Bad idea? Oh probably.
But it'll make me rest that much easier if I have to reset and refresh if I'm wrong.
If I'm right on one to start? Well... I hope you don't mind inflated egos.

[inDheart]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

i didn't really think the second thing was a question but wolf sunfan has written long responses to posts that don't even pressure him before

[benguino]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

I am wondering, if you have this intensive of notes about who everybody voted, talked to, and had leans on. Or is it that you were more focused on Gradiant, because of your theory about it being a good time to kill him if he is on the right track?

I feel kind of weird saying this, since I do not really want to encourage people to be quiet and say it is because they are reading, but I am liking reuben somewhat for seeming to be thorough, with his reading (because I think mafias may not need to read as closely, because they do not really have to figure things out). It is the main thing from him that I have a lean on besides that he is funny, though, so I still feel that I should.

Unfortunately, I don't have as notes like that for each person. Most of notes consists of randomly scattered ideas and paraphrasings of the "meatier" posts that happen in the thread so I can easily skim through it and try to see a "big picture".

I mostly looked at gradiant since I was trying to analyze the night actions so his actions were tantamount to my ideas and helped to solidfy reads that I had on people.

[star-crossed]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

Unfortunately, I don't have as notes like that for each person. Most of notes consists of randomly scattered ideas and paraphrasings of the "meatier" posts that happen in the thread so I can easily skim through it and try to see a "big picture".

I mostly looked at gradiant since I was trying to analyze the night actions so his actions were tantamount to my ideas and helped to solidfy reads that I had on people.

OK. Well I would be interested, if you would like to be more specific about those notes.

[roundbox]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

I disagree that it gets us "nowhere". It's not like the night kills are determined by wolf's rolling some dice, there is usually motivation behind the actions of the wolves. Usually this leaves us with finitely many options, some much more plausible than others. The reason I think it is helpful is because when I make a read, I want to make sure it holds some level of consistency with plausible set of wolf night actions.

As for "being a stretch", I only meant that for WnB. I do feel strongly that MML is likely town because of it and I feel strongly that the analysis is inconclusive for both myself and star-cross.

I guess I should rephrase the word "nowhere", but I'm going to be a turbo fucking nerd and invoke a video game character and their views on lies and truth:

"There's only one truth, but endless possibilities for lies, y'know?"

all of these people weaving narratives for what could have happened just feel like they're having a hard influence on who to vote. I would wager one of the people speculating might actually have a devious purpose to it. among those are t-force, reuben, and MML. yours sounds the fishiest, t-forces sounds like a natural reaction, and MMLs seems a bit dumbfounded so if I really wanted to drive this point home, I'd say it's one of you or MML

I feel really different this game about my analytical style and I think it has to do with me recently playing DRV3 and watching a bunch of logic and argument videos on youtube

[inDheart]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

Is it a bad play? Bad idea? Oh probably.
But it'll make me rest that much easier if I have to reset and refresh if I'm wrong.
If I'm right on one to start? Well... I hope you don't mind inflated egos.

holy shit

i want to lynch this post

[the sun fan]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

holy shit

i want to lynch this post

somewhere, alette shudders

[roundbox]

Re: TWG CLXXIV - Sounds Like You've got a Problem. - Game Thread

Is it a bad play? Bad idea? Oh probably.
But it'll make me rest that much easier if I have to reset and refresh if I'm wrong.
If I'm right on one to start? Well... I hope you don't mind inflated egos.

yeah but the way you're going about this is wagering your entire game and investigative strength on something you called a HOT TAKE
it doesn't inspire confidence