TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]
maybe I was giving the wolfteam too much credit
maybe China Mobile was wolfedComment
-
Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]
No, asking about an authentication for me wasn't cover. I implore you never to forget to consider the possibility that somebody was acquisitioned before their identity was established.
That being said, I am not the acquisitioner and I'm not the worst cover in the world which has me worried that I might be acquired in the future.
In which case if I can be authenticated that's probably a free catch right there.
I need to do some serious reading. I'm kind of at the point where there's a lot of meta going on, and even if I know people's identities, and have an idea of their meta, reading interactions on this level of meta is just something I don't have the experience to do.Comment
-
Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]
..I personally think I have a really good read on the player in the McDonalds slot. Yeah, I've been fucked before, but most of those were a while ago, and I do have some small things that I've been looking at. I kind of already know what your response to this point is going to be, but when she was getting pushed on and made the line "If I get lynched now after I first start trying then I swear..." or something like that I don't remember the exact wording, felt pretty townie to me. I wasn't the one to call this post out, I don't' remember who was, maybe shell. McDonalds is also more likely to joke about being a wolf as town than as a wolf, and some little things while they were joking felt townie to me; it didn't feel like a wolf joking about being a wolf, at least not to me. McDonalds also pushed Verizon really hard when she didn't have to. Wasn't that hard of a push at all. Was just like 2-3 one line posts about how they're inactive, and then they switched votes to i think facebook.If the game plan was to bus Verizon (Roleblocker Wolf) after UPS (vested wolf) died, then it makes no sense for McDonalds to try to save Marlboro (Vanilla Wolf) yesterday. It just doesn't make any sense to me. Can kinda see that, but multiple people have disagreed and you'd have to ask for their thoughts on that, I quoted those below this post
Microsoft is in a similar spot for me but for completely different reasons. Town has done an incredible job lynching wolves thus far, I don't think anyone can disagree with that point. Yes, Microsoft's votes early on were worthless, and I do think that this is a point against this slot being town. After that, however, Microsoft was pushing elsewhere (McDonalds) for most of the phase This was one of my points against him was that mcdonalds' defense was good in that argument, and microsoft 'couldn't let them go'. I thought it was a bad vote, and voted Marlboro "for pressure" once it became clear that Marlboro was dead as shit. Now, this might melt your brain, but I think this is townie for similar reasons as to why McDonalds is townie for trying to save Marlboro (though McDonalds is more townie for it for sure). Not sure how the reasons are similar. I can get the idea on mcdonalds, but not on microsoft. A nail in the coffin is not townie points.
Alibaba I can't really say much about, they probably should die. I think they're more likely to be a wolf than the acquisitioner, but I don't really want to fight someone if they disagree here. I don't think its likely he asked how he would know whether he was acquired or not or whatever the question was, get a response from me, and then still pretend to be dumb, it just isn't how dumbtells play out in my experience. He could be a wolf though, the game just would make a lot less sense to me in that case. Yeah i wasn't sure which of wolf or acquisitioner they would be
A point against you more than anyone else is my current nightkill theory, which right now is the only thing that makes sense to me, really points to the wolfteam having a competent member making competent kills.
My current theory is:
N1:
Apple wolfkilled
WalMart moved somewhere else (almost certainly China Mobile)
Disney vigikilled
this is the easy one, I think we all agree that this is what happened. Apple is a GOOD wolfkill because he was doing more work than everyone else, and we also can look back at Apple's reads list and see that his reads were pretty fuckin' good. Killing people for putting in work isn't really a smart kill but a fear kill.
N2:
Wells Fargo wolfkilled
China Mobile moved somewhere else (almost certainly GE)
Amazon vigikilled
this one is a bit tricky to put together. China Mobile makes very, very little sense as a wolfkill, especially considering the n1 and n3 wolfkills (I'll get to the n3 one in a bit) really seem like they weren't made by TWG playing Chimpanzees like a wolfkill on China Mobile seems. China Mobile also just feels like they were acquired because of the almost completely dropped roleplay. I make sense to be the wolfkill because of the story that the wolves were telling. The story was "We don't want people who vote for wolves and do work to be alive," and Apple and I fit both of those. China Mobile just makes no goddamn sense after the Apple kill. You can basically rule out China Mobile being a power role, ESPECIALLY if they were acquired (but the wolves wouldn't know that, I am saying this point in hindsight), because its such an easy way out of being lynched, and it really was close between the two wagons. The China Mobile kill, if they were wolfkilled, is a kill of incompetence. The night 1 and likely night 3 kills are not. A team of Marlboro and AFK Alibaba (probably 0 presence or very little presence in wolfchat so it would basically be Marlboro by himself deciding) killing me doesn't really make sense, and a team of them + Verizon killing Apple makes I guess a bit more sense, but its still really strange, at least to me. A team of those two killing China Mobile is not at all impossible, but then n3 makes no fuckin sense because GE was almost certainly acquired, because he didn't shoot anyone. The only reason I can see for that is because he was acquired. There is literally no reason not to shoot. Shell pointed out a while ago that seer-immune is just a lot better than 1-shot bulletproof in this setup, and I think he's right, so I don't think GE popped a vest. We know the doctor was roleblocked, so the wolfkill getting blocked or saved is impossible, and so is the vigikill. Basically, the wolfkill being China Mobile made little sense on D2, and now on D4, it makes practically none. The only, and I mean only, possible alternative I see to it is that the wolfkill was China Mobile AND China Mobile attempted to acquire someone else, but it still requires the wolfkill to make very, very little sense.
(As an aside, if you are right about China Mobile being the wolfkill, I think the reasoning behind it that you provided on D3 *is* the reasons why they would kill China Mobile, its just still a bad kill)
Yeah, I was confused too. I made a post about that when people were questioning it.I threw out the shit about china mobile as a possibility. Now that we know the role usages though, a nightkill on you seems the most likely, but with the work you were putting in,
it's not really a 'smart' wolf kill like hunting for PRs but again, sort of a fear kill.
n3:
Ge wolfkilled
Acquisitioner moves from GE to... someone else idk who
Mostly said it already, but wolfkill couldn't have been blocked or saved given the info that we have currently. Makes no goddamn sense for GE not to shoot, his kill couldn't have been blocked or saved, the only wolf left is the godfather, who is not nightkill immune, and the acquisitioner is not likely to pick 1-shot bulletproof. Last wolf really has no choice but to kill the vigi, they're the biggest threat to the wolfteam, they just have to hope that the doc doesn't save GE and saves Shell or gets blocked or was the acquisitioner or something. Their back is against the wall. Not really smart pick then, rather the obvious common-sense pick
So you're probably wondering why I've typed all this shit out in a case against you being a wolf.
Basically, I think the wolfkills make the most sense if they have you as a wolf, mainly because they aren't trash and appear to be pretty sensical.
McDonalds kills people for meme factor. I think McDonalds is town, and the wolfkills don't really look like McDonalds would make them anyways. assumption
Microsoft probably doesn't make kills like those, though I suppose its more likely. based on what?
Alibaba was afk, so its really just up to Marlboro to make a kill on night 3 most likely, and I don't think they kill me there. Marlboro has talked before about trying to win as a wolf by means of atrophy (similar to how Shell makes wolfkills), and killing me would do the opposite of that. Talked before as in this game (I missed it?) or you know who they are? And Charu doesn't just make kills for chaos, it's a mixture of that and looking for PRs.The biggest obstacle I have is that I /could/ be wrong about the wolfkill on n2, and they just chimped out a killed China Mobile.
It really just leaves you. You would make those nightkills. Apple is a good player, I know you could see that, and you would want them dead. I would have voted on two wolves by n2, you would want me gone more than anyone else in the POE. GE was a kill you would be forced to make because you are competent.
Additionally, it FEELS like Verizon was bused looking at the wagon. Facebook has pointed out that the China Mobile wagon was nothing but confirmed town (minus him but he's confirmed now), so wolves should be on the Verizon wagon most likely if they're active. You would need town points to go deep in this game because you could tell you were on a team with 3 potatoes. You also just deepwolf a lot of the time in general. Difference between this game and the game I one was with both the number of players in the game making me not have to get through more phases to win, and the PRs that game being incompetent and not talking to eachother. Bussing here early is suicide due to the amount of PRs alive we have right now. It's unwinnable. I don't really understand how you can call me scum because of 'smart wolf play' but then use this whole thing as a point.
Another thing too is to look at how was also on Verizon: mcdonalds. You probably won't care though because assumption that mcdonalds only kills because memes
I could be wrong here. It could be Alibaba, there's a small chance its Microsoft (him telling people to shut the fuck up when he was getting pushed on just kind of feels outside of his wolf range though), it just feels like its you to me. The night actions don't really make sense to me otherwise.
A wolfteam of Microsoft and Marlboro killing China Mobile is just too ????????? in my mind. I'd like to think Microsoft wouldn't make a kill that bad, and I don't think you would kill China Mobile there.
I think I've said everything now.
I think the whole argument with wolfkills isn't as valid as you think it is. A smart player hunting through wolfkills would be looking for clues of PRs to get them out early rather than them being left with what we have now, only missing the vigi. Instead they were going after people that were posting a lot, and then once roles are outed, they need to take out vigi because that's another chance for them to die. That's not smart, that's just common sense. Shell kinda nailed it here with 'paranoia' due to one game I played.
I appreciate you waiting for the case and wanting to respond/refute it rather than just calling me bad for wolfreading you, that was a mark of class.
So as a whole, don't really agree with you on mcdonalds, and others have agreed (2 of our PRs), and your argument against me is an assumption that all the wolfkills are really smart when they're mainly fearkills for activity (apple, you (possibly)) or common sense (GE). And I can see a lot of not as competent players making fearkills.
A bit insulting you don't think I would try more to hunt for PRs because I most definately would. I couldn't the game I won because when the roles were outed, they were doctors that could save eachother so I was forced to pick off towns every phase.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]
Alibaba
I'm fine with Google now (good response btw). Just because the nightkills were people doing work doesn't mean that wolves weren't looking for PRs btw.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]
I think for you, it's not a matter of showing work or anything. It's literally you have a bad spot, and since godfather isn't dead, me checking you, or anyone else for that matter, means nothing.No, asking about an authentication for me wasn't cover. I implore you never to forget to consider the possibility that somebody was acquisitioned before their identity was established.
That being said, I am not the acquisitioner and I'm not the worst cover in the world which has me worried that I might be acquired in the future.
In which case if I can be authenticated that's probably a free catch right there.
I need to do some serious reading. I'm kind of at the point where there's a lot of meta going on, and even if I know people's identities, and have an idea of their meta, reading interactions on this level of meta is just something I don't have the experience to do.
Agree or disagree, I don't really care a whole lot. It just makes sense to use one of our lynches, if we miss today, on you.Comment
-
Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]
I think I'm ok with killing Alibaba or Microsoft, then IBM blocking the other if its a missComment
-
Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]
Google, sometimes you just need the other person to tell you why you're wrong. I think that's what I needed here, so thanks.Comment
Comment