TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[Shell]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

that's not how this works

my power only works if it targets the ACQUISITIONER, not his target

so the only way my power could have worked D0 is if it hit Walmart.

Read your role again.

✧

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Acquisitioner cannot use the powers of a power role if they take over a power role

so GE was not acquisitoned.

thankfully.

[GE]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Read your role again.

✧

He's right you know.

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

We know that:
IBM is not acquisitoned (replacement stuff, or at least its very likely they were not acquired)
Marlboro is not acquisitioned (replacement stuff, or at least its very likely they were not acquired)
GE is not acquisitioned because of the night death confirmation
Starbucks was not acquisitioned (no way someone puts in that much work into language analysis. I'll ISO him again to make sure stuff is consistent tho)
Shell was not acquisitioned (That player is REALLY HARD to impersonate, and the question I asked him is pretty lock, and I thought they were that player on d0)

We can guess that:
Google was not acquisitioned (Kinda trusting Shell here, I'll ISO them though)
McDonalds was not acquisitioned (I will ISO this player again but I made a snap read on their identity that I am almost positive is right and they've felt consistent)
I was not acquisitioned (Shell/Google/Starbucks can vouch for me on this one, I think)

Leaving:
Facebook (But I don't think so, I'll ISO)
Alibaba
Microsoft

can I get input on this?

Also Starbucks is correct about how his role works, as I understand it.

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Starbucks, other than IBM, who else stood out when you did language analysis?

[Starbucks]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Starbucks, other than IBM, who else stood out when you did language analysis?

I don't remember I'll have to check my notes later

Wells Fargo and Shell I was able to figure out identities for and that has been consistent

[Microsoft]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Everyone has been "i know all these people" but not one person said they know me. I kinda like it.

i have a guess as to who you are if it helps you feel better

The whole reason I thought it was so ridiculous that Marlboro was acquired was because it was basically impossible for someone to guess their identity.

nvm, back to 99% sure i know who you are then.
also, i have a guess as to who marlboro is too.

I've just be frustrated lately with irl shit. Doesn't help that I subbed into a game where one of the roles is literally a 3rd party who subs people, making my subbing in scummy from the start. I have no clue how to proceed without screwing up and I'm starting to think that there isn't a way to do so.

scratch that 'is' is now 'was'


anyway i have a potential monkey wrench

how do we know no one got acquisitioned last night? like clarify for me pls

[Microsoft]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

oh and vt or doctor

[Microsoft]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

oh and marlboro did shoot up in towniness for me with one post

Verizon feels more solid.

replacement or not i'd expect a wolf to keep up with who's alive and who's dead, especially when it's regarding a partner
voting a wolf upon reading without knowing they had already died looks good imo

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

how do we know no one got acquisitioned last night? like clarify for me pls

the previous account that the acquisitioner occupied would've been flipped, and it would've been revealed that they were role x, but also the acquisitioner.

[Microsoft]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Alibaba Group - claimed nada. hasn't said a thing for ages
Facebook - seered green. nothing else of note
GE - claimed vigi
Google - claimed vt/doc
IBM - claimed blocker
Marlboro - claimed vt/doc
McDonalds - claimed nada. still not liking.
Microsoft - me. obv town. lock clear status 110% (also seered green)
Shell - claimed cop
Starbucks - claimed deal breaker
Wells Fargo - towny as fuck

poe has me at mcds, alibaba (potential acq? was wanting to drum up discussion of the acq early in d1), and google.
obviously pool could include wells, facebook and me due to no claims but facebook and me do have a cop check to back us up (even if it doesn't mean much thanks to acq and godfather)

[Microsoft]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

the previous account that the acquisitioner occupied would've been flipped, and it would've been revealed that they were role x, but also the acquisitioner.

- If the aquisitioner has acquired a new account, every time they make a successful acquisition it will flip as the original role UNTIL they are caught, which will flip their original role AND the aquisitioner role at the same time, like this:

_________ has died, they were ___________ and the Aquisitioner.

you fucking idiot

you

fucking

idiots

[Microsoft]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

just to make it clear

[Microsoft]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[QUOTE=Xiz;4556285]- If the aquisitioner has acquired a new account, every time they make a successful acquisition it will flip as the original role UNTIL they are caught, which will flip their original role AND the aquisitioner role at the same time, like this:

_________ has died, they were ___________ and the Aquisitioner.

every time they make a successful acquisition it will flip as the original role UNTIL they are caught

flip as the original role UNTIL they are caught

..

[GE]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

just to make it clear

So you're saying China was possibly the acquisitioner? and it wasn't the wolf kill possibly?