TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

I mean if they believe in your case, sure.

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Last post of the night is if the massclaim does happen, people SHOULD NOT claim VT, they should claim

"VT, Doctor or Dealbreaker" aorn.

[Starbucks]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

I am about to make a shitty play, but I want vindication from Wells Fargo so I'm just gonna do it anyway

despite the potential that all of the evidence I have is wrong, I'm just gonna make this easy

I'm the deal breaker and I targeted Marlboro last night

The monster post I made was my reasoning for choosing Marlboro last night, but I want to make clear that the MAIN REASON I think Marlboro is a acq. is because I targeted him and no acq. kill happened.

I'm more or less useless as a PR at this point, except in the case I'm wrong, in which case oh well

[Starbucks]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

I suck for claiming, etc, I don't give a shit, sorry

[Starbucks]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

if an acquisition kill happened last night, I was not going to make that monster post fwiw

[Google]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Pff, the last EoD was just a shot in the dark and you know it, lmao.

✧

Early votes on Verizon weren't because inactive, I don't remember any of Verizon's posts actually being good enough to stand out, along with his shitty vote and ditch on wells. Don't even

[Shell]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Okay, finally back, sorry.

✧

[Google]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Haven't read all the posts from start up until now, but I'm seeing a lot of 'suprised Amazon was town' posts and it's throwing up red flags. All these posts and no votes on Amazon for final vote count

[Marlboro]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

You guys should think a little harder. Like why would the Acquisitioner lob uncertain votes around if they were active on D0? Wouldn't they want to not get in trouble and drive suspicion away from themselves? Cause, you know, that'd be dumb.

Now Starbucks, if you dealbreaked me, it could mean that the Acquistioner is after me due to my lackluster posting history, and felt the need to use my account to hide.

[Starbucks]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

You guys should think a little harder. Like why would the Acquisitioner lob uncertain votes around if they were active on D0? Wouldn't they want to not get in trouble and drive suspicion away from themselves? Cause, you know, that'd be dumb.

Now Starbucks, if you dealbreaked me, it could mean that the Acquistioner is after me due to my lackluster posting history, and felt the need to use my account to hide.

Are you doubting my claim and night action?

[Shell]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

I am about to make a shitty play, but I want vindication from Wells Fargo so I'm just gonna do it anyway

despite the potential that all of the evidence I have is wrong, I'm just gonna make this easy

I'm the deal breaker and I targeted Marlboro last night

The monster post I made was my reasoning for choosing Marlboro last night, but I want to make clear that the MAIN REASON I think Marlboro is a acq. is because I targeted him and no acq. kill happened.

I'm more or less useless as a PR at this point, except in the case I'm wrong, in which case oh well

sik

The only thing that would suck if our beloved blocker blocked you.

✧

[Google]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Haven't read all the posts from start up until now, but I'm seeing a lot of 'suprised Amazon was town' posts and it's throwing up red flags. All these posts and no votes on Amazon for final vote count

Namely IBM

[Shell]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

But I don't think that's the case, because well, Acquistioned failed, lmao

✧

[Shell]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

You guys should think a little harder. Like why would the Acquisitioner lob uncertain votes around if they were active on D0? Wouldn't they want to not get in trouble and drive suspicion away from themselves? Cause, you know, that'd be dumb.

Now Starbucks, if you dealbreaked me, it could mean that the Acquistioner is after me due to my lackluster posting history, and felt the need to use my account to hide.

A likely story.

✧

[Marlboro]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Are you doubting my claim and night action?

Nope, if anything targeting me was a good play. I'm just saying I'm not the Aquisitioner. Of course if I start acting weirdly next day phase you know why.