Sanz bussing here makes little sense mathematically speaking.
First of all, that argument is pointless because mathematically the chances of Andy/Sanz being true are the same as Rapta/H&H or Haku/Andy etc. (1 PR & 1 VT)
Secondly, how you will decide what you believe Sanz thinks is purely based on hypothesis since you have no reference as to how Sanz plays on the long run.
There's a similar analogy when playing poker that says you could start thinking "If I know he's bluffing in that spot, I should do A" then "But if he know's I know he's bluffing in that spot, I should do B" then "But if I know that he knows that I know he's bluffing in that spot, I should do A!" and so on. Point is, no matter what you'll think Sanz would do in both teams, unless you're positive you can predict his behavior (in which case you should point it out explicitely and clearly for others to understand), there's no way you're more than 50% right at this point.
Back home, looks like I've got some catching up to do. Just got home from work, my roommate's car broke down on our way back, so I was treated to a 30min walk.
Unfortunately I have to leave again in about 30min, so don't expect much out of me right now.
Comment