TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Well, I thought a bit of a change would help. I think unmodified me is a little too easy to copy.

On the other hand, you're now in charge of making sure I'm me

Maybe I was wrong.

I shouldn't be focused on this anyway.

[Verizon]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

You guys are pretty lucky I'm not the whatever its called, I'd wipe the floor with you fools.

Clearly not the *whatever its called* 'cause they don't even know what it actually is amirite?!?!?!?!?

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Clearly not the *whatever its called* 'cause they don't even know what it actually is amirite?!?!?!?!?

When I was making that post my head kept saying "Inquisitor" even though I knew it was wrong.

How do you feel about my shitvote on Mickey D's?

[Shell]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

China Mobile is my new favorite person. Also, semi-serious vote on Visa for speculating about how many wolves there are. That's a really easy way to look town, because only the wolves know how many wolves are in the game.

That's totally a good reason.

✧

[Shell]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Joking, it's not, mister!

✧

[Apple]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

When I was making that post my head kept saying "Inquisitor" even though I knew it was wrong.

How do you feel about my shitvote on Mickey D's?

It was a shitvote?

[Shell]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

I also got a snap person-read from this post. However, I pretty much have to be wrong on it.

If I was right, this post would look very good for Disney. However, it would mean they're not moderating their posting style at all in a post that is about distinct typing styles. Those two facts don't mix for me.

Uh, yeah, gonna have to say you should probably not rely on meta reads here, pal.

It's not a good business practice, you understand?

✧

[Verizon]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

When I was making that post my head kept saying "Inquisitor" even though I knew it was wrong.

How do you feel about my shitvote on Mickey D's?

Not expecting anything really serious for this whole cycle tbh

[Shell]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Not expecting anything really serious for this whole cycle tbh

Even after closing hours?

✧

[Apple]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Uh, yeah, gonna have to say you should probably not rely on meta reads here, pal.

It's not a good business practice, you understand?

✧

It's not like I'm going to out who I think they are. Plus, I already addressed the unreliability of the read in the post you quoted.

[Shell]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

It was a shitvote?

Hey apple, do you want to invest in our fine fuels and oils? I'd give you a special discount.

✧

[Apple]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Hey apple, do you want to invest in our fine fuels and oils? I'd give you a special discount.

✧

This seems pockety in context.

I'll allow it.

[Walmart]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Nah, I know for sure now.

The change you've made is noticeable, but even breaking out a dusty thesaurus instead of a brand new one won't change anything.

You guys are pretty lucky I'm not the whatever its called, I'd wipe the floor with you fools.

It appears Wells Fargo can't handle our verbose diction.

Regardless of that fact, I think it is time to enter a more serious phase of discussion. We've had our introductions, so let's get to work.

I agree with Apple on the purpose of IBM's tomfoolery in the style of posting. It is clearly to bust any acquisitioner that would take him over, as imitating the style might cause a headache. I'm sure a dedicated acquisitioner would have no qualms taking them over and adopting the posting style, but this wholly depends on the player controlling them. A careful eye would have also noticed that Shell is doing a similar thing albeit much more simple.

I feel like Wells Fargo's vote on McD's was not a shitvote, another nod towards Apple's mindset (and Shell in addition). The vote's purpose was to half call out McD's call out of Visa for talking about the number of wolves. I think McD is looking extra desperate here trying to find some way to project town. Any seasoned player would know that speculating about the number of wolves is non-alignment indicative. Clearly a fool's mistake.

There are still several CEOs that the whole thread would like to hear from. At this juncture, I am liking Apple the most.

Shame on Verizon for not wanting serious discussion for this cycle. As they say, idle hands are the devil's workshop.

Thank you,

Sam Walton

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Currently aware that apparently you cannot post links. I'm trying to get this resolved.

Fixed

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

A careful eye would have also noticed that Shell is doing a similar thing albeit much more simple.

Come on, don't point that out. Make the acquisitioner see it.