TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

I was gonna mention this. plus I find the idea of it catching on even briefly kind of amusing. like maybe I would try to policy lynch someone for doing it because lol?

also I feel like outlawing this would be very difficult to enforce. do you punish someone for actually using the ignore function but not telling any of the other players they did it? (btw how would you find out?) do you punish someone if they don't actually put someone on ignore but tell everyone they did it?

you make some gud points though. but idk I think it's pretty low on the list of possible rule additions that could be considered.

plus having players deal with this kind of thing the way they want to in-game can be fun. like when fiction made it very clear to everyone in OOT games that he would never send conversation logs to anyone regardless of his alignment/role. or like when afrobean would lynch anyone who told any kind of fib. except this would be more fun I think.

yeah I don't think it should be considered as a rule

I just think it would be annoying if it happened regularly but that's just my opinion

[Makilaz]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

i feel like this is the wrong thread for the ignore discussion but maybe that's just me

[MarioNintendo]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

I had a great time watching this game.

[MarioNintendo]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

Thank you all for this.

[MarioNintendo]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

One day, I will participate in a TWG (I never know when these start, ugh) and get my ass handed to me. Please.

[Makilaz]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

One day, I will participate in a TWG (I never know when these start, ugh) and get my ass handed to me. Please.

very soon the host voting will start and someone will get voted to host the next game. then signups for the game. this is basically the time to jump in if you're going to since we're between games and who knows how long the next one will take

[Charu]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

500 years

[thesunfan]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

guys, you're doing it wrong
the proper way is to spam when gaem until the host puts the voting thread up

[thesunfan]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

when gaem

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

when magemasher

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

when flamthrower

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

when Gimli

[roundbox]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

when Pontiff Sulyvahn

[XelNya]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

I think ignoring players is probably not worthy of being made illegal. I've even done it before, against Bowser's fake Seer claim in the Smash game.

Lurker MVP imo. I made a point before I died of saying "WHY IS NOBODY CONSIDERING PAPYRUS?" Completely dodged the gun the entire game.

If people are gonna make putting users on ignore illegal, we should probably make it so EVERYONE in the game has to not appear hidden at all first.

That'd be a MUCH BETTER place to start.

Or you know, we need to discuss times it's ok to self-vote.

Because that's been getting out of hand to a point where I am gonna start gunning down people who do it. It's getting real annoying.

And yes, I am aware I've done it. It was a while ago.

Also, I don't agree with lurker getting mvp in specific.

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale Postgame

If people are gonna make putting users on ignore illegal, we should probably make it so EVERYONE in the game has to not appear hidden at all first.

yeah I think it would be useful to have "invisible" not have any effect when visiting the TWG subforum

I get that people invisible for other reasons, so I don't think the system should auto-toggle that setting when entering the subforum (or force players to manually become visible whenever they view), but allow the system to ignore that setting when a user is visiting TWG, or something like that