TWG 150: Undertale
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
I have papyrus as my 2nd highest human lean after sans, can you talk about why? Everything his done has been minimal thus far. I've expected far more from him. Maybe he's just busy, its part of why I'm giving him a small benefit of the doubt, but I have nothing that I've liked from him, and he hasn't followed up on anything, like his comment on why listening to me makes people stupid.Comment
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
Oh I'll go back to Undyne then I guessI get the reasoning against sans, but there are a few things standing out to me
1) that wagon is 100% not clean
2) sans's end of day vote makes literally zero sense if he's a wolf. If a wolf isn't in danger of being lynched, a wolf moving his vote last second makes you look sketchy as fuck and has no utility attached to it. (why would a wolf vote against a town lynch last second?)
are you basing this solely off of the whole 1 in 4 statistics?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
it's really arbitrary but I don't see a wolf saying this
everything else he has is null
in retrospect you could read this the exact opposite way though
someone is concerned not with being able to contribute to the game, but instead is concerned having a phantom vote on them which makes it easier for them to die the next phase
but then if that was true, why wouldn't they just throw out a shit vote
suggesting that they do care about where their vote goes
so yeah maybe this isn't a good thing to be reasoning aboutComment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
I have to admit that I hadn't been thinking about it like this, and I see how you're doing so, but its not how I feel. At least they're explaining their absence, that's not really a bad thing, but its that they haven't done anything else beyond that, and you should know by now how much that makes me want to kill people.it's really arbitrary but I don't see a wolf saying this
everything else he has is null
in retrospect you could read this the exact opposite way though
someone is concerned not with being able to contribute to the game, but instead is concerned having a phantom vote on them which makes it easier for them to die the next phase
but then if that was true, why wouldn't they just throw out a shit vote
suggesting that they do care about where their vote goes
so yeah maybe this isn't a good thing to be reasoning aboutComment
-
Comment
-
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
fair enoughComment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
This position is garbage though: "Oh Sans was a human? I was right! Now let's follow my vote on Undyne!" vs "Oh Sans was a monster? I wasn't sure about him, but Undyne is for sure a human guys!"Comment
Comment