TWG 150: Undertale
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
curious if you feel the same way about everyone on that wagon or just undyne for the switchComment
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
My thoughts are is if he's monster, he's a shitty one. Why hide any info. Who cares if the humans get to know, there's more of us then them.
He's null, leaning red right now.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
you gon' get blasted for this
I went through your EOD posts to see if there was anything that even remotely hinted at dropping a vote on me. Here's what I found:
(just posting this here since it's your first post coming into EOD)
Here's a question, but it doesn't smell of "I'M GONNA VOTE FOR YOU" (if you still want me to answer this, you might want to be a bit more specific about which "assumptions" you're comparing this to).
Here's another question, but this feels like garbage since you're not putting anything forth. You're not saying "how do you feel about monster kid's post X", but rather, "hey tell me your thoughts on X, thanks for bullshittin' with me"
Your follow-up is a response with no substance whatsoever. Does this count as a strong implication? I'm having doubts. A vote based off of this reaction will feel more like sheeping or gutvoting rather than having any solid basis. ORRRRRRRRR you could be wolf as fuck and put that vote to pres your buddy Doggo. Speaking of Doggo, how did you feel about him at EOD again?
(click on this one to see this is a response to mad dummy saying Doggo was an option for a lynch)
why drop the issue br0??
At this point I wouldn't say your vote on me was strongly implied. If anything, it was ambiguous if your vote would have fallen on me or Doggo. Perhaps if you posted some rationale BEFORE YOUR VOTE instead of making boring jabs or extremely open-ended questions, it would have been a little more believable. Hell, you even criticized Papyrus with a pun, so don't even try to spin it that your pun against me was in your favor.
*more prunez*Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
Trying to decide who's worse out of monster kid or sans. I think one of them is human, but def not both. I don't think a human would buss a partner in that way this quickly.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
as in Mettaton's wagonomics post is probably in the top 3 best game-related posts in this threadComment
-
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
On the topic of the night kill:
It looks like complete ass, which more than likely means the wolves were just shooting in the dark. I have no clue how they could have pulled any sort of blue out of Toriel's posting history, so it begs the question of the experience of the wolf team. Unless the wolf team was reading Toriel's true identity, which therefore led into them believing they're blue for being so overly passive, there's no great reason why I would see a Toriel kill happening. Why not kill Mad Dummy? Why not kill Mettaton? Are they trying to get their hands off scot-free for this kill due to very little post interactions? It's hard to take this point further since we don't have information about every players' identity.Comment
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
One could argue that playing passively would also draw attention from the wolf crew.i think the majority of the blues would want to hang back and try to go unnoticed with the exception of maybe the bomb (who would want to attract wolf attention so they can get a kamikaze kill) there's not really any value in going right out of the gate with posts galore because there's no good outcome to be had thereComment
-
Re: TWG 150: Undertale
would you like to develop a case instead of making nothing but defensive posts?
also I'm on the same boat as sunfan Mad Dummy about the night kill being akin to the supermarket anon game.Comment
Comment