Re: George Zimmerman found innocent
okay, drive-by post:
I get mi40's point that systematic poverty isn't necessarily tied to systematic racism but rather a historically disenfranchised poor black population, but...we don't live in a post-racial society. the perception of blacks in America is still very much racist. look at stop-and-frisk statistics: blacks and other ethnic minorities are disproportionately targeted. compare judicial decisions on similar crimes for blacks vs whites: you generally see much harsher sentences and fines for blacks.
and really, that's the fundamental issue that frustrates me in my view. it's less about whether Zimmerman is guilty or innocent (and I honestly believe he wasn't guilty of murder; manslaughter, probably) but about whether the justice system gave both Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin equal treatment--whether this case was balanced based on evidence or on the defendant's race. can you imagine if this was about an African-American adult who followed an innocent white boy against police advice and shot him to death in self-defense? how would the reaction have differed?
and to those who continue to argue that race should be left out of this: fine, but let's keep in mind the controversy surrounding the term "racial profiling" in this trial. even the defense was aware of the racially-charged context of this incident to the point where the TERM "racial profiling" became a no-no.
ultimately, the reason this case is so inflammatory is because we have thousands of potential Trayvon Martins suffering from racial prejudice in America...and thousands of George Zimmermans who can count on getting away with the consequences when the results turn ugly.
DISCLAIMER: this post really isn't to attack anybody, rather just to clarify from my perspective why race should matter in the discussion of this case
okay, drive-by post:
I get mi40's point that systematic poverty isn't necessarily tied to systematic racism but rather a historically disenfranchised poor black population, but...we don't live in a post-racial society. the perception of blacks in America is still very much racist. look at stop-and-frisk statistics: blacks and other ethnic minorities are disproportionately targeted. compare judicial decisions on similar crimes for blacks vs whites: you generally see much harsher sentences and fines for blacks.
and really, that's the fundamental issue that frustrates me in my view. it's less about whether Zimmerman is guilty or innocent (and I honestly believe he wasn't guilty of murder; manslaughter, probably) but about whether the justice system gave both Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin equal treatment--whether this case was balanced based on evidence or on the defendant's race. can you imagine if this was about an African-American adult who followed an innocent white boy against police advice and shot him to death in self-defense? how would the reaction have differed?
and to those who continue to argue that race should be left out of this: fine, but let's keep in mind the controversy surrounding the term "racial profiling" in this trial. even the defense was aware of the racially-charged context of this incident to the point where the TERM "racial profiling" became a no-no.
ultimately, the reason this case is so inflammatory is because we have thousands of potential Trayvon Martins suffering from racial prejudice in America...and thousands of George Zimmermans who can count on getting away with the consequences when the results turn ugly.
DISCLAIMER: this post really isn't to attack anybody, rather just to clarify from my perspective why race should matter in the discussion of this case






Comment