Re: Hard Song Special Batch - Submission Closed
Let me first say: I understand the chart possibly needs work. I appreciate the notes that I did receive, and appreciate the time some of you put into being thorough. I feel like I am steadily improving my quality because of it.
On the other hand.
BOTH times I have submitted Speedcore 300 I have had 1 or more judge(s) bluntly not look at it, or have let a bias affect their judgment. I feel naming names in this thread isn't fair to these judge(s), but I'm just going to voice that some of the judges bluntly need to stop this. I understand you all do this on your own time for free, which is why I feel like saying anything is rude and I really shouldn't complain, but come on guys, if you're not going to be fair do the right thing and just don't judge it, last time I checked judges could do this. Pardon me if I'm wrong.
In reference to the notes I was given:
- I'm kinda sad most of the judges thought the 16th notes were grace notes. In reality they're not. I'm stepping the buzz (douche move I'm aware) without being a over technical ****** like I was on the original chart. Unless you all like 32nd jacks @300 bpm guys, which is what it should be. It's just not reasonable ergo left I left the 32nds out and didn't jack it for the sake of being able to keep it reasonable.
- Will look @ those spots you mentioned Bmah. I think I did that on the original chart but it cluttered it up, so I was watering it down I think. Regardless will look again.
- Thanks qq for the other mentionable spots.
To those who gave notes because they looked at the file: Thank you much. Will begin fixing tonight.
Let me first say: I understand the chart possibly needs work. I appreciate the notes that I did receive, and appreciate the time some of you put into being thorough. I feel like I am steadily improving my quality because of it.
On the other hand.
BOTH times I have submitted Speedcore 300 I have had 1 or more judge(s) bluntly not look at it, or have let a bias affect their judgment. I feel naming names in this thread isn't fair to these judge(s), but I'm just going to voice that some of the judges bluntly need to stop this. I understand you all do this on your own time for free, which is why I feel like saying anything is rude and I really shouldn't complain, but come on guys, if you're not going to be fair do the right thing and just don't judge it, last time I checked judges could do this. Pardon me if I'm wrong.
In reference to the notes I was given:
- I'm kinda sad most of the judges thought the 16th notes were grace notes. In reality they're not. I'm stepping the buzz (douche move I'm aware) without being a over technical ****** like I was on the original chart. Unless you all like 32nd jacks @300 bpm guys, which is what it should be. It's just not reasonable ergo left I left the 32nds out and didn't jack it for the sake of being able to keep it reasonable.
- Will look @ those spots you mentioned Bmah. I think I did that on the original chart but it cluttered it up, so I was watering it down I think. Regardless will look again.
- Thanks qq for the other mentionable spots.

To those who gave notes because they looked at the file: Thank you much. Will begin fixing tonight.








I'm not mad at all; I knew the implications of sending a file like this from the moment I sent it in. It's not like I had this false hope that it was a lock.
Comment