you never rule out the possibility of someone being bs, but there is a point where it's safe to say they're not. the fact is some people are full of shit so it's not wrong to question scores. otherwise we'll end up with another nima.
This is the perfect topic to discuss about since this thread's already been shat up so hard, so let's give it a shot! :P
Alright, so you "never rule out the possibility of someone being bs"? Anyone with half a brain can realize that even if you're a well known stepmania vet like Thaor or whatever you could just take advantage of your reputation and do lower judge or modified ini, yet others like Wooke never get questioned. Is it now made that if you question someone's scores, you are considered calling bs? Why can't the well known guys even put an effort into explaining how a score relates to another if they are questioned?
Also, you said it is not wrong to question one's scores, but it is probably wrong to call bs, which is what the guys on ODI thought. (Wow drama) Anyways, so with the fact that there is nothing wrong without questioning one's scores, how come when you ask it to someone like wooke you get called wrong and all that nonsense?
Try to think of an honest argument because saying "you take stepmania way too seriously" adds absolutely nothing to this discussion
Originally posted by hi19hi19
oh boy, it's STIFF, I'll stretch before I sit down at the computer so not I'm not as STIFF next time I step a file
Comment