SM Scores 2006-2010

[sertman]

Re: SM Scores

What I'm saying is that nearly every single person who has BS'd stepmania scores has acted like you're acting right now. I actually remember having this same discussion about ad hominem in another "you're BS" discussion. I know what I'm talking about, Baha knows what he's talking about, pretty much everyone but you knows what they're talking about because they've been in the community for long enough to know. You haven't, yet you're trying to convince us otherwise? It's not going to happen.

[Bahamut-X]

Re: SM Scores

then he'd get really angry and start pulling out all his fallacy and logic documents

[MrRubix]

Re: SM Scores

ok

what if I said, "rubix is bs because he is a himalayan ho monkey"

rofl

thank you

[cetaka]

Re: SM Scores

np

[MrRubix]

Re: SM Scores

What I'm saying is that nearly every single person who has BS'd stepmania scores has acted like you're acting right now. I actually remember having this same discussion about ad hominem in another "you're BS" discussion. I know what I'm talking about, Baha knows what he's talking about, pretty much everyone but you knows what they're talking about because they've been in the community for long enough to know. You haven't, yet you're trying to convince us otherwise? It's not going to happen.

I've been in the DDR/SM community far longer than most people on this site, and I know this for a fact. Honestly, if you were in my position, and you knew you were legit, what would you do? I know what I'm talking about too, but too many people on this site don't know what they're doing.

[sertman]

Re: SM Scores

Not in this one. Sorry but ITGfreak doesn't count.

[MrRubix]

Re: SM Scores

Even before ITGfreak, man. ITGfreak is relatively newer in comparison. I was playing way back when DDR was born -- even way back when Paranoia and Trip Machine were seen as hard, hard songs, lol.

Edit: Again, sertman, that's like the second or third time you've made false assumptions. So yeah, I get pissed off at misinformation.

[dawg4321]

Re: SM Scores

lmao, try 5th grade dawg.

[[TeRa]]

Re: SM Scores

I've been playing since first mix, as well as you have btw.

[Sprite-]

Re: SM Scores

honestly. rubix you need to learn to stop arguing with people. is it so hard to ignore? you should have learned that by now.

[sjoecool1991]

Re: SM Scores

Blurks


MA needs improving


Meh

[MrRubix]

Re: SM Scores

It takes two to argue, bro.

And yes it is easy to ignore, but I kinda like argument

[sertman]

Re: SM Scores

Even before ITGfreak, man. ITGfreak is relatively newer in comparison. I was playing way back when DDR was born -- even way back when Paranoia and Trip Machine were seen as hard, hard songs, lol.

Edit: Again, sertman, that's like the second or third time you've made false assumptions. So yeah, I get pissed off at misinformation.

No, you haven't been part of the community (FFR, ODI) that's attacking you right now. Just because you've been playing DDR for a long time doesn't mean you can automatically sense when someone is lying about scores based on their behavior. However, because many people here, including myself, have been here for a long time, and we have seen people do it, and you're behaving like people who have lied about scores. I feel like I'm repeating myself.

[lightshark]

Re: SM Scores

The formal term isn't hard to understand. But don't tarnish logic and argument with your pathetic attempts to interject Latin terms into your argument to somehow give you the illusion of credibility, especially against someone who actually knows what they're talking about.

Don't pretend to know the psychological workings of a person's mind. He may or may not have had the intent of using that term for establishing an image of credibility. Sometimes people utilize the reaches of their vocabulary simply to make their message easier to convey. In turn, attempting to include in an argument an unreliable degree of speculation is no better than that which the speculation (in your case) entails.

But seriously, you guys need to take this squabbling elsewhere. FFR and StepMania are tainted enough as it is. The instant a controversy turns into a war of frivolous quarreling (which it indeed already has), both sides lose, as it shows that neither had the insight to realize that the ultimate reward of the debate is, quite expectedly......nothing. Really, E-drama has no merits, nor even any true victors, for that matter. It's even worse when it loses its humor, as it has in this particular instance.

In the end, the moral is the same......grow up or get out. Yes, it's the internet, but what you do on it reflects your actions in real life. This situation is almost to the point of embarrassment; we need no further shame to our generation.

[MrRubix]

Re: SM Scores

I haven't been a part of FFR or ODI, no. I've been active in many other communities under different names over time, is all.

"Just because you've been playing DDR for a long time doesn't mean you can automatically sense when someone is lying about scores based on their behavior"

Right, but again, why make points about my behavior if you yourself admit this?

Repeating yourself? If you haven't noticed, it's because you're making assumptions and not making much sense with your own argument. It *doesn't matter* what I act like. Do you understand this?