Homosexual Marriage
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: Homosexual Marriage
I define it differently depending on who is different.
The reason I believe it to be correct that way is because both genders don't go through the same things. If both genders had the same body parts, I'd say otherwise.
I don't. Tell me, then, what is wrong?Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Homosexual Marriage
Uh, what about the girl I knew who raped several girls AND her boyfriend just because she was bored and wanted to amuse herself?There has never been a woman who raped "for the fun of it".
It feels a whole lot different to be forced to have an orgasm than it does to be forced to have an orgasm inside of you which could potentially make you pregnant.You're right. Men and women would go through VERY different things both physically and emotionally. But you are suggesting that a woman's experience would automatically be worse. I don't agree with that. I think that they would be equally, and uniquely horrifying experiences. For a woman it would be because they were being physically harmed, could become pregnant, could get an STD. For a man it would be because they were physically being taken advantage of, could get an STD, could GET THE RAPIST pregnant and have to deal with the problems that came with that. Problems like potentially being unable to support or protect a child they helped concieve, and knowing the mother was not a very good person (to say the least). As well as various other types of mental and financial damage.The reason I believe it to be correct that way is because both genders don't go through the same things. If both genders had the same body parts, I'd say otherwise.
And emotionally the woman would feel violated, dominated, 'ruined', worthless. While a man could easily feel those same things. I've heard of raped women feeling shame over unwanted arousal during their rape... imagine the feelings a man would experience over not only feeling unwanted, and unwilled arousal... but the fact that his very arousal was what allowed him to be raped!Comment
-
C is for Charisma, it's why people think I'm great! I make my friends all laugh and smile and never want to hate!Comment
-
Re: Homosexual Marriage
Yeah, that's exactly what I mean. Sorry if I worded it poorly, I was kind of distracted with something and couldn't really get the wording out properly. Basically, the idea was in my head, but I got interrupted while typing it and it ended up looking really weird and even gave off the wrong message.
I didn't mean it that way. I'm saying if the EXACT SAME THINGS happened to the EXACT SAME people(assuming two people could be exactly the same, that is), it'd usually be harder on the girl because it's a lot more unpleasant having something stuffed in you while probably bleeding all over than it is having something trying to make you have an orgasm.But you are suggesting that a woman's experience would automatically be worse.
I wouldn't say equally, but they would both be horrifying experiences, don't get me wrong.I think that they would be equally, and uniquely horrifying experiences.
If someone were really raped and got someone pregnant WITHOUT IT BEING THEIR CHOICE, I'm sure something could be arranged so that the one raped is not held responsible. I don't know this as a fact, but I'd think if the lawmakers used common sense with this one, they'd see that a person who's forced into making someone pregnant shouldn't be forced to raise the child, or even SUPPORT the child.could GET THE RAPIST pregnant and have to deal with the problems that came with that. Problems like potentially being unable to support or protect a child they helped concieve, and knowing the mother was not a very good person (to say the least). As well as various other types of mental and financial damage.
Well, there's not much that can be done. It's not as if he would have a choice or would enjoy it if he really didn't want it. I mean, no matter how much you're against it, if someone's stroking your dick, you're probably going to be aroused.but the fact that his very arousal was what allowed him to be raped!
I mean, you could hate it so much, you could hate how it feels. You could hate how the person looks. You could be trying to think of things to make the erection go down. However, in the end, there's really no avoiding it. The fact that it's physical basically takes over most mental parts making it almost impossible to not be aroused if a person tries hard enough.
Same goes for women. They could be screaming and crying, trying to get away, but they'd still be aroused just because of the physical thing that's happening to them.
Also, I realize it could be even MORE humiliating for men to get raped simply because they were "overpowered", and it could really hurt them as a person, make them want to change their gender/sexuality, etc. I'm not saying they don't go through the exact same things, I'm just saying given exactly equal circumstances with the same people of different genders, women are probably more likely to get more hurt just due to the fact of how the rape occurs.Comment
-
Re: Homosexual Marriage
So you were reffering only to the actual penetration. I was thinking broader than that. But yes, I agree that it would be far more physically unpleasant to be penetrated forcefully.I'm saying if the EXACT SAME THINGS happened to the EXACT SAME people(assuming two people could be exactly the same, that is), it'd usually be harder on the girl because it's a lot more unpleasant having something stuffed in you while probably bleeding all over than it is having something trying to make you have an orgasm.
Are you still reffering only to the penetration?I wouldn't say equally, but they would both be horrifying experiences, don't get me wrong.
I was thinking more of the emotional damage that might be caused for the father of the child if he were to be PREVENTED from being involved with the child. Custody of children is almost always given to mothers. If a man were to care about the child, despite how it was conceived, he would have almost no leverage to get custody. And due to the general opinion that women either don't rape, or that it is a very small matter when they do, he would also most likely have a hard time convincing anyone the child was not the result of a one-night stand. Also, while a woman would have considerable physical evidence of the rape, a man might be unable to show such proof.If someone were really raped and got someone pregnant WITHOUT IT BEING THEIR CHOICE, I'm sure something could be arranged so that the one raped is not held responsible. I don't know this as a fact, but I'd think if the lawmakers used common sense with this one, they'd see that a person who's forced into making someone pregnant shouldn't be forced to raise the child, or even SUPPORT the child.
My point isn't about whether or not it can be helped. It's about the deep shame that I can imagine would come as a result. For women there's enough shame involved when they become aroused while being raped. For men, there would also be potential self-hatred due to the fact that if he were not aroused, the woman would not be able to rape him. If a woman is aroused while being raped, it makes no difference as to whether she can be raped or not, whereas for a man, it creates the possibility.Well, there's not much that can be done. It's not as if he would have a choice or would enjoy it if he really didn't want it. I mean, no matter how much you're against it, if someone's stroking your dick, you're probably going to be aroused.Comment
-
Re: Homosexual Marriage
Well, when I was talking about that, yes.Are you still reffering only to the penetration?
This is true. The only way he could really prove that it was rape is if the woman abused him during it.I was thinking more of the emotional damage that might be caused for the father of the child if he were to be PREVENTED from being involved with the child. Custody of children is almost always given to mothers. If a man were to care about the child, despite how it was conceived, he would have almost no leverage to get custody. And due to the general opinion that women either don't rape, or that it is a very small matter when they do, he would also most likely have a hard time convincing anyone the child was not the result of a one-night stand. Also, while a woman would have considerable physical evidence of the rape, a man might be unable to show such proof.
Then again, a woman could, without being abused or even raped, say the same thing if there was simply sex...
Yeah, but I don't think it would be THAT bad considering there would be absolutely nothing they could do to stop it. But maybe that feeling of helplessness would make them feel worse. I don't really know how it'd turn out.My point isn't about whether or not it can be helped. It's about the deep shame that I can imagine would come as a result. For women there's enough shame involved when they become aroused while being raped. For men, there would also be potential self-hatred due to the fact that if he were not aroused, the woman would not be able to rape him. If a woman is aroused while being raped, it makes no difference as to whether she can be raped or not, whereas for a man, it creates the possibility.Comment
-
Re: Homosexual Marriage
Who do you honestly think is more likely to be believed? A woman, or a man.... The woman claiming to be raped, while having not actually been, is in a position of power because she is more likely to be believed. The man who was actually raped is in a position where he will most likely not be believed, thus causing him even more suffering.
Well, imagine you were being tortured... we'll say with electric shock. That would be distressing enough. But add in a new factor, a device that stimulates your brain. This device interacts with your brain in such a manner to cause you to uncontrollably move your arm. You can't help that your arm is moving... that's just what happens when your brain recieves certain messages... but unless your arm is moving, you cannot be shocked. Now not only are you in a situation where you are being tortured, but if you were to prevent your body from functioning in a certain way, you could stop the method of torture. Would you feel ok because you just couldn't help it?Yeah, but I don't think it would be THAT bad considering there would be absolutely nothing they could do to stop it. But maybe that feeling of helplessness would make them feel worse. I don't really know how it'd turn out
I know that seems like an odd way to try to explain it... but I hope it gets the point across.Comment
-
Re: Homosexual Marriage
Well of course. The way things work is bull****, if I may say so myself.Who do you honestly think is more likely to be believed? A woman, or a man.... The woman claiming to be raped, while having not actually been, is in a position of power because she is more likely to be believed. The man who was actually raped is in a position where he will most likely not be believed, thus causing him even more suffering.
If I honestly could not help myself, I would not feel as bad, to be perfectly honest. Then again, I have a really weird way of doing things, and end up not feeling very bad for doing some things I do that others consider terrible simply because I can't help myself, so there's no reason trying to change it more than a possible amount.Well, imagine you were being tortured... we'll say with electric shock. That would be distressing enough. But add in a new factor, a device that stimulates your brain. This device interacts with your brain in such a manner to cause you to uncontrollably move your arm. You can't help that your arm is moving... that's just what happens when your brain recieves certain messages... but unless your arm is moving, you cannot be shocked. Now not only are you in a situation where you are being tortured, but if you were to prevent your body from functioning in a certain way, you could stop the method of torture. Would you feel ok because you just couldn't help it?
No, I understood you pretty well.I know that seems like an odd way to try to explain it... but I hope it gets the point across.
I mean, to be entirely honest, I don't know how I'd react, because nothing like that has ever happened to me physically.
Dunno, read a page or two back or whenever this rape topic started. I consider it very interesting, myself, as we've said almost everything there is to say about homosexual marriage until someone brings up a new point that reverts it back to the topic.Comment
-
Re: Homosexual Marriage
There have been a lot of topics covered over the history of this thread. It's sort of a 'how many steps to reach THIS from THIS' kind of thing....
You could go from cereal boxes to genocide if you talked long enough.Comment
-
Re: Homosexual Marriage
Yeah, conversations change drastically all of the time. I was once talking to a regular here about Diablo 2, then it turned into a talk of bestiality, then about an FFR regular or something. "Unrelated" things turn into related things fairly quickly.Comment
Comment