Homosexual Marriage

[GuidoHunter]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

I am not gonna take the time to read some of the other posts because I know I'm gonna get pissed off at some of the idiots who posted here.

That attitude isn't going to get you very far, here, especially with all the glaring holes Lamoc has in her arguments that the "idiots" so nicely chose to fill in/point out.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

[Brianific]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

(and with good grammar, may I remind you) or don't post at all.
http://andy.mikee385.com

OgOdD HoMoS SHouLD bE aBLe Ta DO WHaT DeY WaNt. DiS iS a FrEe CoUNtrY yUNg.___ Sorry about that, I couldn't resist. You were so uptight about it. :/

[devonin]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

Ironically, your grammar is actually fine in that sentence. Your spelling and punctuation are god-awful, but you didn't actually make the funny joke you were trying to make.

[seltivo]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

there is NO reason same sex marriage should be illegal. if two people love each other, why the hell shouldn't they be allowed to get married? because religion prohibits it? because the majority of the population is EXTREMELY narrow minded?

maybe it's time to stop letting what people said thousands of years ago ruin peoples lives today, and realize that we can make our own choices and do what WE think is right.

religion was only supposed to be a guide line for what we do, not a strict set of rules that people follow like cultists, fearing some divine punishment. really, when was the last time you saw someone get smited? the old testament clearly states that slavery and other such things are ok. it even says somewhere that we should all burn a live cow every now and the because it creates a pleasing sent for the lord. we finally managed to realize that this might be a bit ridiculous, why can't we let a few other preposterous statements go?


sorry, i kind of got carried away...

[GuidoHunter]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

Hi, seltivo. How about you read the thread before posting so that you can find out exactly how many of your points have been addressed already (I'll give you a hint: it's all of them).

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

[seltivo]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

too lazy
besides, i think it needed to be said again

[GuidoHunter]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

No, it didn't, because your argument carries no merit here, as evidenced by the real debate that was going on in the thread.

You won't find yourself welcome in CT anymore with that "too lazy" attitude, either, so I suggest you start reading threads before you post in them.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

[sgkoneko]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

I dissagree with them because if it kept going on then not soon but in the far future, there wouldnt be enough children produced and the population could go down alot, unless there's lesbians because they can get babies from a little building, but gays cant do that.

*blinks*

What? How is this an argument? You think everyone is just suddenly going to go gay? What if I don't know, blondes procreating was outlawed, and then suddenly it was trendy or legal, do you think suddenly we would have this huge amount of blonde children running around? No.

People have always been free to choose. The amount of gays hasn't gone up any, it only seems that way because they aren't afraid of coming out anymore.

And actually! They are working on a way for women to be able to make artificial semen from their bone marrow or something. Anyways, soon Lesbians WILL be able to make babies.

And another thing.. The world is SEVERELY overpopulated. China and Japan could do with more gays and I think MANY places in the US could as well. I think we are nearing a point where we need to limit procreation. I seriously, SERIOUSLY, doubt homosexuals are going to drop our population number.

[devonin]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

I really don't think that encouraging the rights of homosexuals is even something that should be brought up in the same breath as discussion of world population. The two have not one thing to do with one another.

[PurifiedWater]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

Wrong. You're completely missing the issue if this is what you think could happen.



So people can't have everlasting love without government recognition?

When I get married under the eyes of God I'll be married. Signing papers is a mere formality.



Yeah we do. Last I checked we prevented others from having slaves and stabbing each other.



I'm quoting this to highlight the fact that your poor grammar is severely hindering your ability to make a point. What, praytell, is my "right to the constitution"?



Actually, there are a lot of questions about that, some of which I detailed in the OP of the other thread from which the above quote came.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

good points, yet i think it all depends on: A, what your beliefs are (christian, etc,) and B, If you choose to be homosexual, its your life.
I think it is ,like i've mentioned before in a different post, the same situation as abortion. All about choice.

[Kilroy_x]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

All about choice.

Bullshit

[sgkoneko]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

good points, yet i think it all depends on: A, what your beliefs are (christian, etc,) and B, If you choose to be homosexual, its your life.
I think it is ,like i've mentioned before in a different post, the same situation as abortion. All about choice.

I have to agree with Killroy. You can't choose who you are attracted to. That's part of the make up of deep personality traits that are genetic. You can't just say.."You know what... I think I want to date the same sex this week."

[Kilroy_x]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

Genetic... or otherwise biologically determined, but yes, not something you can will yourself out of.

[Kamunt]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

Genetic... or otherwise biologically determined, but yes, not something you can will yourself out of.

Not willingly, at least, definitely. There's been many a reported case proving that homosexuality can be "beaten", more or less, out of an individual by driving Christianity deep into their skulls repeatedly with a Spiritual Sledgehammer. I don't have any links ATM, but I have read articles and even a study done that addresses this matter. I don't really think this method is exactly fair....because, I mean, it's forcing the individuals to feel guilty about what they are, or by what they think they are. And that's just unfair.

[devonin]

Re: Homosexual Marriage

It's rather akin to the fact that my left-handed father had his arm tied behind his back in school as a child, to try and force him to become right handed. Even if it works, you can't possibly justify it as an acceptable practice