Democratic primary!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • heyhey11
    FFR Player
    • Aug 2003
    • 403

    #31
    Originally posted by jewpinthethird
    See, what Bush did with his whole "shoot first and ask questions later approach" is, if Iraq did have WMDs and got rid of them, there is no proof now.
    I cant tell your opinion on this statement but id like to add that IT WORKED! The nukes are gone now all we have to worry about is North Korea who were 100000000 times less of a threat
    Originally posted by 87x
    if some dude was hiding in the bushes trying to get a picture of me.. and i found him.. thats an invasion of privacy.. ima whoop his ass.. then sue him.. then have sex with his wife just out of spite

    Comment

    • Yanah_God
      Banned
      • Oct 2003
      • 1330

      #32
      Originally posted by heyhey11
      Originally posted by jewpinthethird
      See, what Bush did with his whole "shoot first and ask questions later approach" is, if Iraq did have WMDs and got rid of them, there is no proof now.
      I cant tell your opinion on this statement but id like to add that IT WORKED! The nukes are gone now all we have to worry about is North Korea who were 100000000 times less of a threat
      yep

      all of their nuclear weapons are no threat at all to the united states, or any other part of the world

      Comment

      • makaveli121212
        FFR Player
        • May 2003
        • 3823

        #33
        well there is no doubt he had the weapons...for christs sake there is tons of video footage of parades of missles and warheads...however, i wouldnt underestimate nroth korea, theyve been under the radar for a while now, and they hate the US more than Iraq did
        Originally posted by VxDx
        Stick it in her butt and pee.

        Comment

        • jewpinthethird
          (The Fat's Sabobah)
          FFR Music Producer
          • Nov 2002
          • 11711

          #34
          Originally posted by chardish
          North Korea is a far lesser threat because they don't HATE us. Saddam actually HATED us, and he believed he had a divine mission to put a stop to us. Ever read Iraqi news reports? All the reports on the war before the fall of Baghdad say the same thing: "Allah will protect us and not allow the demonic enemy to enter our land" or something to that effect. When we're viewed as demons, they'll try to destroy us.
          Originally posted by makaveli121212
          well there is no doubt he had the weapons...for christs sake there is tons of video footage of parades of missles and warheads...however, i wouldnt underestimate nroth korea, theyve been under the radar for a while now, and they hate the US more than Iraq did
          Wha...? You two are contradicting yourselves. So, Chardish is saying that Iraq is more of a threat because they hate us. While Maka is saying that North Korea hated us more.

          Originally posted by heyhey11
          Originally posted by jewpinthethird
          See, what Bush did with his whole "shoot first and ask questions later approach" is, if Iraq did have WMDs and got rid of them, there is no proof now.
          I cant tell your opinion on this statement but id like to add that IT WORKED! The nukes are gone now all we have to worry about is North Korea who were 100000000 times less of a threat
          Just as Japan was no threat to us before WWII. Japan of WWII and North Korea now both want the same thing. Economic stability. To say that N.Korea is less of a threat is just plain ignorance.

          Comment

          • Falcon
            FFR Player
            • Jun 2003
            • 433

            #35
            Just as Japan was no threat to us before WWII. Japan of WWII and North Korea now both want the same thing. Economic stability. To say that N.Korea is less of a threat is just plain ignorance.
            good analogy. however, does Korea even have the ability to get nukes to our shores? last time i heard, Iraq didnt. also, though a lot of what our government does comes as questionable to me, i trust their decision to attack Iraq before Korea. for some reason, i think they would make the correct decision there.

            Comment

            • jewpinthethird
              (The Fat's Sabobah)
              FFR Music Producer
              • Nov 2002
              • 11711

              #36
              Well, I remember there being a lot of hoopla over how North Korea has the technology to launch nukes that can reach the west coast.

              I dont know. I we will just have to wait and see.

              Comment

              • User6773

                #37
                Originally posted by jewpinthethird

                Wha...? You two are contradicting yourselves. So, Chardish is saying that Iraq is more of a threat because they hate us. While Maka is saying that North Korea hated us more.
                We're different people, with different opinions. Just because we share one doesn't mean we share them all.

                Comment

                • makaveli121212
                  FFR Player
                  • May 2003
                  • 3823

                  #38
                  heres my opiion about korea...lets say eventually we invade them...this is all hypothetical, but...so we invade them because they have nukes...well we are destroying them with our great army/navy/airforce...so we have them backed into a corner...they have no chance...but like the japs in wwII they dont stop fighting, and when they have lost all hope, they shoot a nuke straight up, and have it land on them, thier country, but the US troops as well...those asians have pride, who knows what theyll do
                  Originally posted by VxDx
                  Stick it in her butt and pee.

                  Comment

                  • jewpinthethird
                    (The Fat's Sabobah)
                    FFR Music Producer
                    • Nov 2002
                    • 11711

                    #39
                    True. Very true.

                    Comment

                    • LEGO
                      Banned
                      • Apr 2003
                      • 994

                      #40
                      It's called honor over there.

                      Comment

                      • MalReynolds
                        CHOCK FULL O' NUTRIENTS
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 6571

                        #41
                        I believe they were called Kamikazes during WWII, and they fancied themselves as Samurias, which, under classical definition, they were.

                        Mal
                        "A new take on the epic fantasy genre... Darkly comic, relatable characters... twisted storyline."

                        "Readers who prefer tension and romance, Maledictions: The Offering, delivers... As serious YA fiction, I’ll give it five stars out of five. As a novel? Four and a half." - Liz Ellor


                        My new novel:

                        Maledictions: The Offering.

                        Now in Paperback!

                        Comment

                        • makaveli121212
                          FFR Player
                          • May 2003
                          • 3823

                          #42
                          no not kamakazis, thats what hey called those in planes who would crash themselves into battleships to sink them, but ultimately sacraficing themselves...and lego i think pride is pretty much the same as honor
                          Originally posted by VxDx
                          Stick it in her butt and pee.

                          Comment

                          Working...