I think this whole "let's make a lot of rules because now we have people who can" thing is pretty stupid. Host discretion works very well, considering they can limit their game and what goes on during it a hell of a lot more effectively than people who are actually a part of it. If any rules are added, I strongly believe that they should be procedural and not limit the host's powers at all, only make pre/post game run smoothly and quickly.
About the BDN situation: You didn't receive a PM saying "you're a wolf," so at that time you were NOT a wolf. They fucked up by telling you. As far as I'm concerned, it's the same thing as if the wolves said "lawl killing x" 5 minutes before night is over, and the guard changing his pm. Perfectly reasonable.
I think this whole "let's make a lot of rules because now we have people who can" thing is pretty stupid. Host discretion works very well, considering they can limit their game and what goes on during it a hell of a lot more effectively than people who are actually a part of it. If any rules are added, I strongly believe that they should be procedural and not limit the host's powers at all, only make pre/post game run smoothly and quickly.
About the BDN situation: You didn't receive a PM saying "you're a wolf," so at that time you were NOT a wolf. They fucked up by telling you. As far as I'm concerned, it's the same thing as if the wolves said "lawl killing x" 5 minutes before night is over, and the guard changing his pm. Perfectly reasonable.
I agree completely. The reason this thread was created wasn't to revamp the way TWG is run, it is simply to adress any problems as they come up.
If there is an issue that must be dealt with, or one that could significantly improve the game, it should be brought here.
TWG Offense Lengths:
1st offense: Two game ban
2nd offense: Double original two game ban (Four game ban)
Every repeated offense after the second offense will be doubled.
Offenses are invalid as follows:
10 people or less: 10 posts contributing to the game
11-20 people: 15 posts contributing to the game
21-30 people: 20 posts contributing to the game
31-40 people: 35 posts contributing to the game
The ban length is fine, But It's the same issue we discussed before.
Originally posted by DarkManticoreX2
There needs to be some type of basis for that idea. You can't just ban people for not reaching a certain amount of posts because its all realative. Say someone gets killed night 1 and hasn't posted anything yet. Thats not ban worthy, or someone dies night 2, but has 3 very game oriented posts. This also isn't banworthy, just because they haven't met a quota.
I would say though If it's day 3, and someone has no worthwhile game influencing posts (even if they have 20 posts) thats worth a ban, because all that person is doing is postwhoring.
Each situation is different, so I think we need to talk a look at each one and assess it from there.
AAA's = 800
Originally posted by V
Manti, I apologize for insulting you. Let the record show that I am a prickass douche, and not only that, but that I am a terrible player.
Not eactly helpful for me, i don't tend to be on at 12 o clock at night, i know i am tonight but its not a regular thing!! Signups should be set to accomodate worldwide time zones, not just US zones.
Comment