just got bryce ^__^

[soccr743]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

I dont get why people call throwing a few polygons on a stage art...

It has no meaning what-so-ever. Get either Maya, Lightwave, 3DS Max, or Softimage. Then you can learn and get good at creating 3D scenes with a different approach rather then putting polygons together with reflections...

-----Soccr743-----

[Mwerp]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

sup close minded literalist 2day

[djsmalls]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

meh made a bg for my new song in bryce now ^__^

[Squeek]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

THANK YOU APERSON AND SOCCR.

See Mwerp, some people agree with me.

Porgy makes great stuff using his programs...don't see why there is the need to call his methods crappy.

~Squeek

[flypie743]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

When did anyone call his methods crappy?

[Squeek]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

Other threads in the 32-bit forum.

You'll see them if you look.

~Squeek

[flypie743]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

No. What you showed was a completely different style of art(if you even want to call it that, I'd call it a bunch of models). It's like trying to compare a vinyl cd case to a television remote. It's just not right. What we WANTED to see was abstract, not models.

Would that be what you were referring to?

[omgwtfToph]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

Wait, what the hell? Bryce is awesome unless you suck. RJ uses nothing but Bryce and Photoshop and he's the best graphic artist I've ever seen. If you want to be a mainstream trendwhore, go for it, but don't force your beliefs down other people's throats.

[Porgy]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

as I said earlier in another thread, im done arguing that subject with the people who don't know any better. If you are stuck on shiny spheres and other geometric objects knock yourself out on Bryce. Consider me here to critique and offer advice to those who strive to create more advanced modelling and animation. Im working on a caustics test right now with Maya's mental Ray engine using light photons and high dynamic range imaging that I will post as soon as it's finally rendered. Unfortunately, that will take a while since despite the fact Im running a P4 3 ghz and a geforcefx 5900 ultra it is still taking about an hour a frame to render.

[omgwtfToph]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^



Made in Bryce and Photoshop - that's "shiny spheres and geometric objects?"

Ok whatever

[Porgy]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

yes, just photoshoped the hell out of.

[Porgy]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

here is one of my favorite artists: Meats Meier




Completely modelled, textured, and rendered in maya.

[Mwerp]

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

THANK YOU APERSON AND SOCCR.

See Mwerp, some people agree with me.

Porgy makes great stuff using his programs...don't see why there is the need to call his methods crappy.

~Squeek

You fucking moron.
Aperson is an abstract artist.

as I said earlier in another thread, im done arguing that subject with the people who don't know any better.

Don't know any better? I'm a thousand times better than you in this field so I wouldn't say stupid shit like that if I were you.

If you are stuck on shiny spheres and other geometric objects knock yourself out on Bryce.

This is odd because Toph showed you that amazing piece of art by Radical Julian and asked you if it was shiny spheres and shit, and you said "yes, just photoshoped the hell out of"
What the fuck.
I have the render he used in that.
The texture is NOT SHINY AT ALL. It's PLAIN.
There are no spheres used AT ALL.
Either you can't use your eyes worth shit or you're just bullshitting yourself and everyone else in this thread with the childish closed-minded attitude you have. I'm thinking it could be both.

Consider me here to critique and offer advice to those who strive to create more advanced modelling and animation. Im working on a caustics test right now with Maya's mental Ray engine using light photons and high dynamic range imaging that I will post as soon as it's finally rendered. Unfortunately, that will take a while since despite the fact Im running a P4 3 ghz and a geforcefx 5900 ultra it is still taking about an hour a frame to render.

That's great and all but us cool cats are into abstract. Art with sparse literal meaning, yet infinite possibilities of interpretations pertaining to the resolute meaning. If you want to find some community that's interested in the modeling you do, that's great, and we won't go and tell you guys that your shit is useless and you should get another program to do it in.

[Porgy]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

You fucking moron.

this where I stopped reading. Not going to waste my time reading garbage from someone who just degrades others based on their opinion. Have a peachy day.

[jewpinthethird]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: just got bryce ^__^

My Two Pence:

If you are serious about graphic art, use another program like Maya or 3DstudioMax.

If you just want to make images for fun, then use whatever the hell you want.


Okay, now I am going to rant. (The following is not targeted towards anyone. Dont take it personally if you are insulted.)

True ART is dead and its rotting corpse is crawing with parasites. Feasting on the heart of the corpse is Modern Art; in the eyes, colonies of photographers can be found; and in the brain, graphic artists lay their eggs.

Graphic art: It is great when it is done right. It is a shame that that is rarely the case though. People think, because they can add some lens flares here and there, and sprinkle in some geometric shapes all over the place, that BINGO, abstract art, "I am a f*cking artistic genius." Sure, it may look pretty, but you are not an artist.

Photography: I like photography. I have seen some awesome photos. But almost anyone with the money and thus, the equipment can become a "photographer." All you need is a 35 mm camera, some black and white film, a pack of cigarettes, some tight fitting designer jeans, and a hip "messy, yet not messy" hair cut. And you have to listen to obscure indie/emo bands. Also, you have to develop your own film. That is all it takes to becoming a photographer...but you still are not an artist.

Modern Art: For the most part, I hate it. IF IT REQUIRES AND EXPLAINATION TO PROVE IT IS ART, THEN IT IS BULLSHIT. Go to any "modern art" museum and chances are you will find that half the "art" in the museum are large canvases that have had paint poured on them. Next to the canvas, you will most likely find one or two paragraphs explaining why it is art because the person who made it is richer than you and you know nothing. It is nothing more than a fad. IF YOUR NUMBER ONE REASON FOR PAINTING IS MONEY, YOU ARE NOT AN ARTIST. In my opinion, this is the "pop music" of the the visual arts.

Now, not all modern art is bad. Just the bulk of it.

Well, that is my narrow minded opinion.