Seeing the limits of my hand endurance

[ThEclipse]

I thought you knew more about Stepfiles....
For instance R D L D R D L etc.
Stuff like that.

[87x]

The only thin I have to say about this is "missing arrow"....

[Tasselfoot]

eclipse... didn't know that was something difficult... again, i don't play index... and, i've never made a stepfile in my life...

[Arch0wl]

I still can't believe people are calling bs on me even though I HAVE OVER 15 FUCKING WITNESSES. When I got off the cam half of the chat including some of the most credible users on ffr (I AM ONE OF THEM) were watching me. YOU CAN'T BS AN ENDURANCE RUN WITH 15 WITNESSES. THE WHOLE POINT OF IT ISN'T YOUR SCORE IT'S YOUR ENDURANCE.

As for the missing arrow crap, maybe you calculated wrong. Or SM did. Fuck if I know.

[Master_of_PARANOiA]

Gj Arch, that's fucking ridiculous.


**EDIT** Oh yeah, since I have 45 minutes of my life to waste, can you send me the full video (if you have it), please?

[dantheman650]

I saw the enitre thing so anyone calling bs can screw off. He did it and I watched it. So stfu.

[JustinJJK]

I saw the enitre thing so anyone calling bs can screw off. He did it and I watched it. So stfu.

[Tasselfoot]

i believe arch. jeebs...

[ThEclipse]

I think that was based at 87x.

[Nima]

LOL you guys are so fucking stupid... that score isn't bs.

[lightdarkness]

Ok, let me just state that I believe arch 100%.

87x, The actual score doesn't matter, what matters is he passed quasar 30 times in a row, on 1.5 rate. 15 people saw him do it. I don't know how you can be calling BS on it. There is so much evidence he did it.

Anyways, as i've told you on aim arch, congrats.

[Nima]

30 times quasar 1.5 isn't hard it's just impressive cause its TIRING on index. The fact is the ENDURANCE not really the score.

[Squeek]

Argh. Why debate over a single arrow? It's not like it could be doctored with witnesses. It's not like it's fake since the result is POSSIBLY one off from 30x playing the song...it's still THIRTY TIMES playing the song with ending shown. How else could you get those results? Playing it 31 times would mean many more. 29 means many less. So the fact that it MIGHT be off by one is irrelevant. The numbers are close enough to 30 times played through that it IS 30 times played through.

Besides, why would Arch want to lie on something? There's no gain to it...

~Squeek

[djsmalls]

Argh. Why debate over a single arrow? It's not like it could be doctored with witnesses. It's not like it's fake since the result is POSSIBLY one off from 30x playing the song...it's still THIRTY TIMES playing the song with ending shown. How else could you get those results? Playing it 31 times would mean many more. 29 means many less. So the fact that it MIGHT be off by one is irrelevant. The numbers are close enough to 30 times played through that it IS 30 times played through.

Besides, why would Arch want to lie on something? There's no gain to it...

~Squeek

my feelings exactly squeek ^__^
thanks

[zildjian133]

Mystery arrow.... but I believe.... I believe......