Re: To debate religion or not, that is the question
hey afrobean i am a christian and i just wanted to jump into your discussion i wanted you to know that evolution had not honestly been provable because i have researched that topic to know end and everything they have come up with as missing links and everything have not been provable because they had a species named Lucy they thought was the missing link that was an animal they thought could stand up but still had the shape of a monkey. They eventually found out it was a pigmy chimp, it was a male, and they had based everything off of one bone out of the entire skeleton. Also following evolutionary laws, all species should evolve from single celled very simplistic animals to very complex billion celled creatures. Although according to Darwins tree of evolution it is incorrect because the tilobyte is one animal that defied that law. It was one of the first creatures discovered to be a very early animal which they therefore placed at the bottom of the tree where the simple animals were, although they found out that the trilobyte had the ability of using one eye to see something about 2 feet away clearly while they other could see something miles away clearly too. So according to the law which is the basis of evolution, the trilobyte should be placed near the bottom since it was such an early animal, although it is so complex that is should really then be placed near the top, but that is now contradictory. Along with that is the Heckel pictures, where he painted these pictures of embrios of different animals, like a human, a bird, a turtle, and something else, and they all looked extraordinarily similar, although it was later discovered that the paintings were faked and he had taken different stages of development in those animals which looked slightly similar and tried to make them even similar by faking them. That was one of the biggest points of proof for the evolutionists, even after they discovered it to be true it was still being taught as factual evidence in schools. Only in the last probably decade it has been recorded as false in textbooks. Now those are only a few examples if you need more of where evolution had proved itself to be wrong.
Another thing with the Bible not being able to prove itself in the modern day world that contradicts your ideas are all of the prophecies that have been fulfilled in our modern world. There is one in particular that i like beacuse it is easy for people to mess with even now. In the Bible years ago there was a prophecy that a city named Tyre was powerful and magnificant city of the Asyrians, and it was prophecied that the city would be destroyed and a new city of Tyre would be built on an island and the Romans came along and threw the old pieces of the old Tyre into the sea to create a causeway to the island so they could destroy the city. And it was said to be a place that would be be a place for the spreading of nets and never rebuild again. Even today on that island you can find peices of the old city in the ocean surrounding the island, and fishermen still spread there nets on the island. and it fell under that reign of Alexander the Great in 332 BC and if you want more proof to anything i have said or some more examples tell me
hey afrobean i am a christian and i just wanted to jump into your discussion i wanted you to know that evolution had not honestly been provable because i have researched that topic to know end and everything they have come up with as missing links and everything have not been provable because they had a species named Lucy they thought was the missing link that was an animal they thought could stand up but still had the shape of a monkey. They eventually found out it was a pigmy chimp, it was a male, and they had based everything off of one bone out of the entire skeleton. Also following evolutionary laws, all species should evolve from single celled very simplistic animals to very complex billion celled creatures. Although according to Darwins tree of evolution it is incorrect because the tilobyte is one animal that defied that law. It was one of the first creatures discovered to be a very early animal which they therefore placed at the bottom of the tree where the simple animals were, although they found out that the trilobyte had the ability of using one eye to see something about 2 feet away clearly while they other could see something miles away clearly too. So according to the law which is the basis of evolution, the trilobyte should be placed near the bottom since it was such an early animal, although it is so complex that is should really then be placed near the top, but that is now contradictory. Along with that is the Heckel pictures, where he painted these pictures of embrios of different animals, like a human, a bird, a turtle, and something else, and they all looked extraordinarily similar, although it was later discovered that the paintings were faked and he had taken different stages of development in those animals which looked slightly similar and tried to make them even similar by faking them. That was one of the biggest points of proof for the evolutionists, even after they discovered it to be true it was still being taught as factual evidence in schools. Only in the last probably decade it has been recorded as false in textbooks. Now those are only a few examples if you need more of where evolution had proved itself to be wrong.
Another thing with the Bible not being able to prove itself in the modern day world that contradicts your ideas are all of the prophecies that have been fulfilled in our modern world. There is one in particular that i like beacuse it is easy for people to mess with even now. In the Bible years ago there was a prophecy that a city named Tyre was powerful and magnificant city of the Asyrians, and it was prophecied that the city would be destroyed and a new city of Tyre would be built on an island and the Romans came along and threw the old pieces of the old Tyre into the sea to create a causeway to the island so they could destroy the city. And it was said to be a place that would be be a place for the spreading of nets and never rebuild again. Even today on that island you can find peices of the old city in the ocean surrounding the island, and fishermen still spread there nets on the island. and it fell under that reign of Alexander the Great in 332 BC and if you want more proof to anything i have said or some more examples tell me
Comment