TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
weird excuse to put more stock in wolf read lists that are likely fake as hell what whatComment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Looks like OP mention that they get that info in PM. My bad.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
*So one of the major points for taking them off the table is false then. They're just null rather than null and pushes with backpedaling.post's here. Apologies, it's a pedal back on Boomer (I misquoted), while keeping Punchy firmly in that null position.
Conversation was trending over 2-3 pages prior to my Fauna post in a direction that leaned on that world.
*I'm just confused as to where I fit in there as I don't believe I've seen anyone going that world. You're also majorly leaving out Flurry.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
I disagree. As a wolf is be playing the long game and creating distancing from the get go or trying to muddy the waters. I think most wolves would be playing a similar gameGiven that my iso post covers every post in-game up until right now, no. I don't think wolves would expend the energy to distance themselves literally all game. That's such a huge commitment to make, and would be easier to just commit to townreading each other, or not have anything to say to one another. Distancing imo is pretty applicable to situations where you don't want pairing on a certain idea, but not very applicable to scenarios involving the entire game.
Theatre is all there is to being a wolf. You're pretending to solve and your goal is to make people believe you're doing the right thing. Doing conflict resolution and planning is done in wolf chat so I'm not sure what you're really asking here.Better question: Do you think it would be more likely for Fauna to create wolf theatre with their wolf partners for literally the entire game, or take it up in day/night chat for conflict resolution when it happens, and split the difference? There's no Acqui now, so wolf chat is guaranteed not anonymous right now.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
What do you think of this now, Flurry?
Also, Agent S, I agree with Cherry that she is by far the right conclusion here.
Gonna do a coloured vote thing like Phil did yesterday. Should help us now with more info.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Funny that you mention Flurry but not Tank, which is what I would call myself out on.
I've said some time ago that Flurry has been a mindmeld for me, but I've contemplated the idea of it being a pocket. If it came down to it, I'd probably say there's a t/w/w in Phil/Flurry/tank(Merengue,Villager) from Fauna's interactions, but that would be after Cherry & myself both flip town and we're in MYLO.
You alone probably took the worst beating out of anyone from Fauna, in comparison to Apollo & Punchy.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Tank's slot is fucking dead. At some point, it's going to have to be modkilled rather than replacements since that's doing nothing but screwing us over. Flurry on the other hand, is posting.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
If you were the blocker you blocked del but why would you say this vvvIf I am the Nerfed Doctor, then I did nothing.
If I am the Vigi, I shot Punchy because I think there's 1 W in Julian/Punchy.
If I am the Blocker, I blocked Del for obvious reasons.
If I am the PI, I targeted Apollo because he was odd early game.
Melba, Dotty, Apollo and Zucker didn't vote last phase.
So, the only surprising one is Apollo.
Interesting votes:
Chief -> Dora
Punchy -> Chief
Maple -> Apollo
Cherry -> Flurry
Fauna -> Dotty
To make that make sense. Why would thinking that a blocker is a 2nd doctor make you want to block them?Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
d1
Dora [1]
Chief
Apollo [1]
Maple
Dotty [1]
Fauna
Flurry [1]
Cherry
Julian [2]
Agent S, Del
Zucker [9]
Flurry, Phil, Tank, Dora, Rolf, Molly, Julian, Boomer, Chief
Chief [1]
Punchy
--------------------------------------------------
d2
Dora [8]
Boomer, Phil, Eugene, Agent S, Fauna, Mathilda, Cherry, Del
Chief [2]
Tank, Dora
Julian [1]
Maple
Flurry [1]
Punchy
--------------------------------------------------
d3
Molly [4]
Julian, Eugene, Fauna, Tank
Chief [8]
Cherry, Molly, Boomer, Phil, Agent S, Mathilda, Rolf, Flurry
Chrissy [1]
Apollo
--------------------------------------------------
d4
Maple [6]
Agent S, Cole, Mathilda, Flurry, Rolf, Apollo
Agent S [5]
Tank, Punchy, Maple, Julian, Phil
Rolf [1]
Fauna
Flurry [1]
Cherry
Cole [1]
Boomer
--------------------------------------------------
d5
Cole [5]
Julian, Merengue, Yuka, Punchy, Phil
Agent S [4]
Boomer, Cherry, Fauna, Cole
Fauna [4]
Agent S, Rolf, Flurry, Apollo
--------------------------------------------------
Fauna [4]
Merengue, Rolf, Apollo, Agent S
Agent S [4]
Phil, Punchy, Fauna, Flurry
Flurry [2]
Julian, YukaComment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
To me that seems like you were setting up for a counter claim o. Del but your partners told you that was a dumb idea and so you made an excuseComment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
And what does this have to do with what I said about me being in that mentioned world but nobody bringing me up enough to where I'd actually be in the selection people want to lynch in?Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
I like this a lot, it is a far better explanation for that weirdness than '2nd doc?????' what whatComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment