TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
what about you, flurry? would you vote cole? what about fauna?Comment
-
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
vote agent s today and cole next phase imo what whatComment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
one of my favorite things is forcing wolves to vote for each other
given Agent S's recent inputs, Cole stands out more than Apollo
I'd be happy with some combo of Agent S, Apollo, and Cole ATM
if Agent S is town, uhhh I guess Fauna looks bad? Cole looks better but could still be wolf?
if Agent S is wolf, Apollo, Cole, and maybe even Fauna look badComment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
I could be swayed onto cole with sufficient motivation but I really think agent s gotta go first for that atrocious slip reaction/explanation what whatComment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Here you go, here's the entire string of posts, in order of occurrence.
2 minutes before eod without a votecount makes you sweat buckets when it's between yourself and someone that did the same mistake as the first game you ever played. Was also super paranoid that wolves would swing the vote because I thought votecount on me was higher than what was given 2 minutes before eod.was referring to the possibility that if I die, to check the people casting last minute votes that put me over the top in comparison to the already established Maple lynch, because I think when push comes to shove, votes established ahead of time leave a better impression on confidence and their world view for the game than those cast last minute.Comment
-
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
let past cherry motivate present cherry:
finally at a computer so it's chrissy/cole time what whaaaaaaaaat
skipping a lot of chrissy's early game since i did them already so let's go
pure fluff, contributes very little at all. i don't recall there being much contention on boomer's claim so dunno what that's all about
someone earlier pointed out that in a w/w between chief/chrissy this would be ez interaction points. with chief flipped, i think this is more likely to be a weak attempt to look like they're scumhunting without contributing much.
the 'what does wifom mean' thing i'm still torn about, leaning towards them not actually being as inexperienced as they're trying to show
i'd need to do a proper vote analysis but i'm pretty sure if del hadn't hastily unvoted that this would be insta right here. chrissy then immediately unvotes, likely after seeing del's unvote. trying to hammer is inherently wolfy, and i'm willing to bet money that this was a vote with intent to hammer
this is their last post in the thread. willing to believe that they were playing dumb here
your slot was being read scum for lots of reasons, not just inactivity/replacements. kinda don't like the vibes i'm getting from this, i don't think a townie would be this quick to anger about their slot
seems a bit too defensive here imo. basically from their entrance to here they've been hyper defensive the entire time instead of jumping in to try to do some solving
"i have at least one partner on the zucker wagon and am trying to deflect attention away from them" is how this reads to me
sure the wolves had options that were not bussing a partner day one but that's not enough to clear the entire wagon
i really don't like the bolded part here. cole is grasping at straws trying to get attention away from the zucker wagon and onto anyone else and that just screams that they have a partner on that wagon somewhere
trying to direct attention onto the chief wagon? given how many now confirmed PRs were on that wagon this looks sketch in hindsight
first post in the thread with any amount of content and it's... okay? i guess? it's a lot of words to say you disagree with some folks and feels rather fluffy, like they're trying to look like they're contributing without really digging into anything
this is facepalm inducing. "blockers protect and not just block"? really? if you flip wolf rb i'm going to laugh myself inside out
your logic was inherently flawed in that you completely misunderstood how blockers work. the bolded part is extra sketch because the vigi putting out thoughts just lets the wolves make their night kills easier. if boomer says who they want to kill then if it's a town they can just let him shoot. yeah yeah we're getting into wifom here but i really dislike this bit
i want to call attention to the bolded part because what the fuck does this even mean
bolded part probably important. could envision a maple/cole w/w world where there's a bus happening here
seeing as phil isn't even on the table i don't see why this is necessary. the bits about not seeing the bus as likely and 'correcting people on rather they would bus or not' is needlessly confusing and not something i can see a town saying
"ask me anything" is a wolfy thing to do. though molly did something similar and we all know how that turned out
not sure why you would distrust boomer's claim, or feel the need to point this out
CONCLUSION - disgusting. has not made up any ground for their slot since replacing in. welcome to the scumpileComment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Yeah, that's acceptable considering how I've been behaving.
I think your reads will turn around depending on flips and future interactions.
Not too worried about it.
Fauna is starting to look like a common denominator for all of those who posted longer reads recently.
I feel that I can't convince town that Agent S has a bad english issue which led to that slip and that he's not wolfing by meta.
I don't think there's a better option than to lynch him for that reason.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
i think the only reason i'm sketched out about agent s is because fauna's voting there (and flurry to a lesser extent, since fauna and flurry come as a package deal a lot of the time). but she got on that wagon late and, knowing she's in hot water, it'd be a good move to bus a teammate for the long game?Comment

Comment