TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

[TWG Apollo]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Doing a Rolf because fuck breaking that post down on a phone

[TWG Apollo]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Punchy are you finishing your rereading?

[TWG Fauna]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Rolf, I'm aware there are contradictions in my partnerings. Each partner guess was done in relation to the individual ISO, not as a whole, this is why I said that Apollo/Agent S/Tank is the world I'm currently focusing on, it is the main one without any contradictions

[TWG Julian]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

finished rereading the first phase so far. flurry has some very contradictory posts, like saying he doesn't think lynching inactives is a good idea in this kind of setup since wolves can just ensure they have a few more posts than town's lowest poster, but then later on says he'll always vote for me whenever he's not voting an inactive. i really really want to say he's not a wolf just based on his timing with the zucker vote (he basically turned that into a wagon himself), but given how all over the place he's been playing it could've been a miscalculated play from a wolf. i dunno! if flurry's still around at the end i'd be scared. there's also a chance someone as a wolf is roleplaying as the person who i'm pretty certain flurry is, in which case we are FUCKED

think tank/merengue is town too given the timing on their zucker vote. at that point it was del, mathilda, or zucker, and they went zucker. could be a yolo move, of course, but it seems legit. i will say though that between the rolf/tank headbutting that went on there, rolf looks a lot more townie than tank

gonna keep reading

[TWG Fauna]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Apollo

I did bring up that you townread people yea, but for no other reason than it was a reads list and I wanted to see how it compared to your future reads lists. Think of it as commentary mode. I admit I got a bit lazy at this point, I'd been on it for like 4 hours, but heres some quotes for your other stuff

Agent S - "Flurry I still think is quite town, despite dropping off of a bit from yesterday. I assume that the reason behind it because it's a bit open and shut situation for today."

I'm too lazy to edit the post on my phone but I don't think the reasoning behind this is good. If anything choosing to bounce because the lunch target is secured is sketchy at best

I like this post though it's something I vibe with and falls in line with my thoughts on the molly train

Only used the words I did because I didn't see any justification for your thoughts on Flurry and Molly prior to these posts mindmelding with Agent S

In regards to Tank

Cherry do you think tank and I are on the same team?

Eugene similar question to you. How do you feel about tank town leaning me while you have him as town? Do you think it's a lazy read?

It does. So judging by your most recent post that I quoted I take it your still town reading him? Mind expanding on that

[TWG Rolf]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Rolf, I'm aware there are contradictions in my partnerings. Each partner guess was done in relation to the individual ISO, not as a whole, this is why I said that Apollo/Agent S/Tank is the world I'm currently focusing on, it is the main one without any contradictions

Yeah that's not how this works. You can't read person A's posts and say they can't be partners with person B, but then read person B's posts and pair them with partner A.

[TWG Fauna]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Yeah that's not how this works. You can't read person A's posts and say they can't be partners with person B, but then read person B's posts and pair them with partner A.

Agree to disagree, these contradictions help me prioritise. I chose my natural assumption of what a team would be based on individual ISOs, this helps me more in the future when we get more flips and I can see which worlds make more sense

[TWG Apollo]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Apollo

I did bring up that you townread people yea, but for no other reason than it was a reads list and I wanted to see how it compared to your future reads lists. Think of it as commentary mode. I admit I got a bit lazy at this point, I'd been on it for like 4 hours, but heres some quotes for your other stuff



Only used the words I did because I didn't see any justification for your thoughts on Flurry and Molly prior to these posts mindmelding with Agent S

Well the first quote you have is where I'm criticizing agent s for brushing off flurry's excuse as a good one. Hardly would consider that mind melding. The second quote sure I agreed with agent s

In regards to Tank

As for these quotes are you serious? How are those quotes me asking for what I should think of tank? Did you ever think about the context that I was asking those questions in? At the time I was being wolf read by most and with tank town reading me I wanted to know how that affected their reads.

If you're really trying to build a case you're doing a terrible job

Also even if that was the case and I was asking people what I should think of tank 3 questions can hardly be classified as "a lot"

[TWG Apollo]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

You're not looking good fauna. You're looking like you're trying to build a case for a mislynch

[TWG Fauna]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Your mistake is the fact that I wasn’t doing these ISOs with the goal of making a case on anyone, I don’t think anything I really posted is alignment indicative, I was posting it purely to look at interactions and anything of note between the six people I mentioned to look at possible partnering

[TWG Fauna]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

You’re right about one thing. If I’m trying to build a case I’m doing a terrible job. I’m just trying to solve the game, and everything I’ve been trying prior to this hasn’t gotten me anywhere

[TWG Boomer]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Yeah that's not how this works. You can't read person A's posts and say they can't be partners with person B, but then read person B's posts and pair them with partner A.

Disagree.
I like where Fauna's head is it in that regard, and I like how she's coming to those ideas.

[TWG Julian]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

I leave for 20 minutes and the fucking acq claims....what the actual fuck is this game

Before I unvote here, are we letting him just go because he isnt a wolf? If we get down to the last few people and acq wins because we didnt get rid of him when we knew exactly who he was, Im gonna be very mad. We essentially lose track of him after tonight.

I know acq winning a game like this is incredibly rare, but still...

Also, does this mean roleblockers block Acq as well? I thought only the PI did that??

Dora can only be a wolf or acq here, so Im kinda expecting a counterclaim at some point...unless doctor was on dora, and so were the wolves?

Unless im just fucking dumb? what is happening

holy SHIT im dumb, it was a vigi claim, ignore everything

got to here in the reread. barring this post being faked, i think it'll be the tipper in deciding what alignment fauna is

i have to wonder why she read boomer's claim as being acquisitioner in the first place. very strange mistake, not to mention the word "shot" came up several times there

if she's town then her analysis holds up. i just don't know how that misread happened to begin with

if she's a wolf then she would've known that boomer and dora aren't on her team and would've interpreted boomer's claim as "holy shit, he found the acquisitioner!" either that or she peeped wolfchat, saw someone said "holy shit we got the acquisitioner!" and skimmed the thread too fast?

[TWG Julian]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

gonna keep reading but at this point there's a very good chance cherry's the bulletproof wolf

[TWG Boomer]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

gonna keep reading but at this point there's a very good chance cherry's the bulletproof wolf

And how did you come to THAT conclusion?