TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
punchy dont be dumb, I would get to see the quicktopic
Obviously I would never relay the names even if they were there because thats against the spirit of the game. But I would probably leak the feelings/motivations that I see. Or I might not do it at all cause its pretty slimyOriginally posted by "OPDue to the possibility of the Acquisitioner infiltrating the wolves, the wolf chat will be in quick-topic. The wolves will know who their partners are only in PM. Posting names/roles in quick-topic is heavily discouraged. This is done to prevent the Acquisitioner from knowing who the wolf team is in case of infiltration.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
It's an anon game, what do you expect? Even in a game with identities on, I would still probably have the same reaction. If you're assuming I know who's behind the keyboard on your account, you're wrong and that's a bad way of going about this game, mrmpht.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
It's not so much a defense as a clarification on a read on a person I haven't had interactions with this game. If Dora's the acquistioner and we can look at their reads as them scumhunting, then not just the intial 'wagonomics' posts are important but also if anything changed from then based on later posts.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Still don't like the level of weak scum hunting that's going on. Still perceive it as looking for mislynch wagon candidates, despite the lynch being locked in for today.don't really like tank anymore. they don't seem to be on the same page as most other people. playing in their own world.
not sure why everybody's so quick to townread agent s. all they've really had recently is a meta read based on who they think i am, made a bigger post about me, then ignored my response to it in favor of indirectly saying they just rolled their eyes at it to someone else entirely. with more people townreading me now i would expect them to push their case against me harder too. for the record, i'm null on them.
getting kinda paranoid about rolf. hopefully another active eod from them will help me out there.
cherry's iso post about chrissy strikes me as kinda wolfy too. seems like an easy way to score town points by reiterating what everyone's already thinking about chrissy.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Keeping it real here i guess. I purposely left bait for someone to bite, and NO ONE TOOK IT. I guess that annoying posting made everyone avoid my posts entirely.
Dory being aqui makes sense. I'd like to use them but democracy says kill em, so whatever.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
flurry's starting to respond the same way del did before you-know-what happened so i'm gonna shut upComment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
At least you're reading them, mrmpht.
Some people are ignoring them like a plate of veggies.
I see. Well, I still stand by my read that you're doing the proper digging and interacting here, mrmpht.It's not so much a defense as a clarification on a read on a person I haven't had interactions with this game. If Dora's the acquistioner and we can look at their reads as them scumhunting, then not just the intial 'wagonomics' posts are important but also if anything changed from then based on later posts.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment