Maple, we can be friends but I don't like what you are doing. It probably takes a lot of effort to type that way. Why not take it easy and chill a bit?
Originally posted by TWG Phil
to go back a bit, can you explain your townread on Zucker, Chief?
alright, i suspect you're lying about being indifferent then. you don't care about solving the game as much as keeping up appearances. you acknowledged not pushing your reads that people ignored but still haven't done anything in that respect either.
did you already forget about me saying I'm getting my ducks in a row? yikes
what happened to not wanting to argue with someone you think is a wolf
if you're too lazy to argue with a suspected wolf, chances are you either shouldn't be playing or you're a wolf
alright, i suspect you're lying about being indifferent then. you don't care about solving the game as much as keeping up appearances. you acknowledged not pushing your reads that people ignored but still haven't done anything in that respect either.
That's gonna be a locked in vote for me. Sorry animal fams, the meta is too stronk.
rolf's leading questions are showy and wolfy
zzzzzz
Originally posted by TWG Rolf
While the case here isn't strong enough personally for me to get antsy for a vote on them, I can at least see where they're coming from it's honest. I'm not sure I'd go ahead and say that all of answering for somebody would be wolfy, but it's something to keep a note of, especially when there's the potential for it to happen multiple times for the same player like what I thought was happening when it seemed Dora was doing the same thing.
Not shoehorning into acquisitioner acting a certain way and playing solely based on that, but keeping worlds open.
There's a very slight chance this could be a setup for backtracking if molly ends up getting lynched and ends up being town, but I think it's more likely here that they're just cautious about wagons forming too quickly which is a towny mindset.
besides last paragraph, many words about nai stuff. change my mind
i interpreted "ducks in a row" as meaning "scoping the situation out." was i wrong?
it's more wanting to get more info before pushing so i don't muddle the thread. Which I think is similar enough, but you're basically saying "okay I acknowledge you doing that, but don't do that"
Comment