It took you this long to say that because???
The last post of the last day phase, besides mine, was telling the vigi to kill them. Why would you think of checking them?
Thinking about which of these would be more likely to be godfather if one of them is the role.
Both starting off inactive but Microsoft having sudden influx of activity day 1 (which I'm assuming is why he got targeted?)
Although microsoft did get active (though it took a while), I still can't get over the latching with people calling shell the acquisitioner
It took you this long to say that because???
The last post of the last day phase, besides mine, was telling the vigi to kill them. Why would you think of checking them?
In the event the vigi decided not to since previouis EoD the vigi did not tackle any of the other lynch targets.
But then assumed it was too much to gamble, so went Microsoft instead.
Actually had it on McDonalds for a bit before switching to Microsoft too, but decided to just put it on a player that wanted McDonalds dead instead.
You guys should think a little harder. Like why would the Acquisitioner lob uncertain votes around if they were active on D0? Wouldn't they want to not get in trouble and drive suspicion away from themselves? Cause, you know, that'd be dumb.
Now Starbucks, if you dealbreaked me, it could mean that the Acquistioner is after me due to my lackluster posting history, and felt the need to use my account to hide.
This is a really terrible post by the way.
It sounds like Marlboro is giving credit to the possibility that he COULD have been acquisitioned, Idk how to describe it other than that.
Comment