TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[Shell]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

And Verizon is not one of my townreads*, therefore, they deserve to die.

Eeeeeeeh....... I don't know if I like this reason.

I mean I get it, but at the same time.

✧

[Microsoft]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

are those based purely off of reads?

that sounded a lot better in my head than it looks

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

What the hell did I do to be on that list, even if it's just for spice?

Honestly, the truthful answer is you haven't been as townie as everyone else imo.

I'm probably not going to vote you, but I do think you'd be a better kill than McDonalds.

[Microsoft]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

I don't really ever look for partnerships.

moreso, if you are who i think you are, and you do end up dying in the night, your reads as town are usually impressive so connections could be helpful.

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Eeeeeeeh....... I don't know if I like this reason.

I mean I get it, but at the same time.

✧

Look man what are the chances that Verizon comes into tomorrow, drops quality posts, and gets townread by more than 2 people?

What are the chances the vigi lets Verizon into tomorrow if we don't kill them?

Pretty low for both.

Plus their posts suck and sucky posting is wolfy.

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

moreso, if you are who i think you are, and you do end up dying in the night, your reads as town are usually impressive so connections could be helpful.

While my reads are sometimes ok (I'd defer to Apple here, their reads look pretty spectacular actually), its not ever because I made some stellar connections, its just not how I do.

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Eeeeeeeh....... I don't know if I like this reason.

I mean I get it, but at the same time.

✧

Look at what inactivity has done to this game, as well.

[Toyota]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

And if that's the case, Google has not been acquistioned either.

✧

I don't like this... post much at all given surrounding events. It seems to me like... an attempt to further clear yourself given what someone did to you.
For example... A says B = Q because X, then B says C = Q because X, chances are B != Q. That or B = C.

Because he's a weird bodysnatching version of the Serial Killer. It's something even the wolves are afraid of. So we can sort of work together with scum to take him out.

hello
I think marlboro is... town actually.


aw rip wayward vagabond what... a shame, hope you had fun, and nice handwriting.

Yo

I highly fucking suggest you use a different browser for this game.

You don't even have to use IE with all the fucking alternative browsers there are out there today.

This is what I do and is... why I can't mobile post.

After thinking it over, please refrain from posting any IRL content such as hand written images. This will fall under the 'revealing identity' rule, due to your irl location/notebook/room is IRL traceable.

This role is new in this setting, so figuring out the tiny bugs is needed. Carry on ^^

Sorry for being... difficult, Xiz

A thought just occurred to me that I'm gonna withhold 'till EoD.

Someone ask me about it when we're less than 5 hours away please so I remember to share, it won't be immediate though.

I hope this got... answered and expanded upon, IBM.

I would like to see Shell roleblocked.

I stand with Alibaba/Microsoft/Verizon/Wells as my townspeople, Facebook and Visa as my wolves, and a massive need to reread the thread. I'll dig in to ISOs etc. later on today.

There needs to... be three more wolves total and you gave two. Are you the... third wolf?

Oh, I don't plan on reading Walmart's posts, but I found it and read through that one. Reading a post a couple further down, Walmart was clearly trying to read the game and share their reads. Whoever asked if they can be trusted, I would say 99% assume Walmart's post was genuine in any one instance

...Is Amazon = Walmart...?

Note to acquisitioner:

If you acquire Alibaba, I'm going to get you lynched

=Acqui...?

Wowie

✧

[\QUOTE]

I'm overthinking the /quote at the end there which makes me think I'm tunneling... shell too hard as acqui, my apologies.

Starbucks, where was your roommate recently?
Or he might still be there I'm not sure.
Either way, just making sure.

you... the acqui, Wells?

[Microsoft]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

now i'm significantly less sure of who i thought you were...

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Toyota, if I knew to ask Starbucks where his roommate was recently, I would already know who he was, meaning I wouldn't need to ask the question.

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

now i'm significantly less sure of who i thought you were...

Good.

[Microsoft]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

There needs to... be three more wolves total and you gave two. Are you the... third wolf?

i hate this line of thinking that every reads list needs to have a perfect breakdown of wolves:town. unless you're god-tier at this game, there should be no reason to have a perfectly accurate list especially when you're not even giving a list of the full roster. if someone has 2 wolves, whatever. if someone has 5, whatever. it's how it is.

-rant over-

...Is Amazon = Walmart...?

china has a friend

[Microsoft]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

either way i feel that wells is my top town for today and that'll be a list i will go back too assuming the worst.

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

either way i feel that wells is my top town for today and that'll be a list i will go back too assuming the worst.

I'll make a full list rq, go to that one if I die, but again, don't take it too seriously. And look at Apple's too, they're a good player (esp if I am right about who they were), and their reads are fairly similar to mine.

[Microsoft]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

shell do you have any opinions on the players on wells' list?