TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Xiz
    TWG Chaos
    FFR Simfile Author
    • Feb 2012
    • 3399

    #631
    Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

    To clarify:

    - You may NOT make a death post this game, due to the aquisitioenr.



    In The Night:





    Walmart has died. They were the old original Aquisitioner account.

    **TO CLARIFY**

    Since the aquisitioner has acquired a new account, every time they make a successful acquisition it will flip as the original role UNTIL they are caught, which will flip their original role AND the aquisitioner role at the same time, like this:

    _________ has died, they were ___________ and the Aquisitioner.


    (This will be going in the OP)




    Apple has died. They were Vanilla Town.





    Disney has died. They were Vanilla Town.





    It is now Day 2. We are down to 16 players, so days will be 48 hours long. Day 2 will end on June 7th @ 10:00pm Server

    Comment

    • Xiz
      TWG Chaos
      FFR Simfile Author
      • Feb 2012
      • 3399

      #632
      Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

      There has been a replacement.



      Also be sure to read your PM's EACH PHASE if you get one in the possible event of an acquisition, to prevent possible fuckup.
      Last edited by Xiz; 06-6-2017, 12:08 AM.

      Comment

      • Marlboro
        FFR Player
        • Feb 2006
        • 5

        #633
        Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

        Comment

        • IBM
          FFR Player
          • May 2017
          • 5

          #634
          Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

          Comment

          • Verizon
            FFR Player
            • Oct 2005
            • 5

            #635
            Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

            Am I missing something in the second spoiler or is there nothing at all in it?

            Comment

            • Amazon
              FFR Player
              • Oct 2003
              • 5

              #636
              Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

              A villager killed one of those two? Here we go again

              Comment

              • Alibaba Group
                FFR Player
                • May 2017
                • 5

                #637
                Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

                flex

                In the spirit of anonymity I won't describe what happened, but I'll be able to be around more now. I'm catching up on the pages I don't have as fast as I can, here are some thoughts while I read and do a time-relevant activity:

                I don't have much (any?) experience playing as 3p, can we read off Walmart's pushes? For example they only had so much information, but I think it looks decent for Facebook that Walmart was suggesting a lynch on them. Since the Acquisitioner's prime directive d1 is to live and second is probably to thin down the town, I assume any efforts to go against the flow were either to stave off a lynch or to push town. They also tried to push Toyota, who I'm about to talk about in a minute, and defended Visa. The other thing about Facebook is their refusal to vote, it could have been a serious accountability dodge there but they also could have helped their buddy if they were a wolf. I think such an awkward post is made by a sincere villa most of the time. Since Facebook wasn't very involved last time I was here, it's not surprising they might have felt uncomfortable voting.

                UPS not self-preserving makes that vote really hard to parse. (Also I don't think my vote was counted?) It looks like Toyota v / UPS w if only because I find it hard to believe nobody tries to save a BPV but I can't be sure because there was a third wagon on Facebook (who was being pushed by 3p) and a lot of people abstained. If people could explain why they abstained that would help me a lot. The other reason I think it was a v/w split is because Toyota's "death manifesto" looks like a real effort to help town in the longterm after their death, rather than just set up a lynch.

                GE gave me weird vibes, I will have to go find the post.

                IBM I really have to object to you posting in your handwriting, I physically can't read your posts, maybe keep it to a few words per post. You have nice handwriting but some of us have bad eyes. Also it personally keeps me from feeling the voice in your writing style and I don't like it.

                Comment

                • Alibaba Group
                  FFR Player
                  • May 2017
                  • 5

                  #638
                  Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

                  Doing an iso is beyond me at the moment unfortunately, but I'll summarise the GE thing:

                  Was called out for defending UPS by not wanting them lynched (seemed to have a general policy against lynching wastefully which was shared by a few others, instead wanted them killed via mod or some other method)
                  Then they wanted Toyota lynched, who seems to have exhibited the exact same pattern of behaviour as UPS for most of the day (when there wasn't information on the end of day wagons)
                  Voted Apple for posting a full reads list

                  It seems like really evasive, non-committal behaviour and doesn't add up.

                  Comment

                  • Alibaba Group
                    FFR Player
                    • May 2017
                    • 5

                    #639
                    Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

                    Like, to clarify: that defense was very sustained and extended, although it may have even been more an issue with how others were playing it was so aggressive. And yet when polled they consistently said they wanted to lynch Toyota. I can see one difference between them and that it's Toyota popped up when called.

                    @GE: Could you explain why you felt voting UPS was wasteful but voting Toyota wasn't? Was there no better vote in your eyes out of the wagons people were willing to vote on?

                    Comment

                    • Alibaba Group
                      FFR Player
                      • May 2017
                      • 5

                      #640
                      Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

                      Are we allowed to talk about replacements?

                      Comment

                      • Amazon
                        FFR Player
                        • Oct 2003
                        • 5

                        #641
                        Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

                        Originally posted by Alibaba Group
                        flex
                        lol

                        your vote was missed, which sent the final vote count to a rand

                        Comment

                        • GE
                          FFR Player
                          • Apr 2006
                          • 5

                          #642
                          Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

                          Originally posted by Alibaba Group
                          Like, to clarify: that defense was very sustained and extended, although it may have even been more an issue with how others were playing it was so aggressive. And yet when polled they consistently said they wanted to lynch Toyota. I can see one difference between them and that it's Toyota popped up when called.

                          @GE: Could you explain why you felt voting UPS was wasteful but voting Toyota wasn't? Was there no better vote in your eyes out of the wagons people were willing to vote on?
                          Toyota has 23 posts, UPS has 3. That's the main reason. And I ended up not voting Toyota. As much as I wanted Toyota dead, I couldn't be 100% sure I was right, so I left a kitb. As bad as it sounds, it wasn't me, so the odds of a wolf being in it were high from my point of view.

                          It looks bad on me because the lynch actually wasn't a waste since we claimed a wolf with it, but I never "defended" UPS, I stated they could die by other means and I wouldn't care, I just wanted to have info to use with the flip. UPS has 3 posts, what are wee supposed to find in their history? I'm glad they were a wolf, but that's all we got. No ties, no pocketing, no distancing, no nothing.

                          On to the next day I guess. Who killed apple and who killed Disney? W/T or T/W? Why them? And where would the acquisitioner go?

                          Comment

                          • Amazon
                            FFR Player
                            • Oct 2003
                            • 5

                            #643
                            Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

                            Wolves killed Apple obviously

                            Comment

                            • GE
                              FFR Player
                              • Apr 2006
                              • 5

                              #644
                              Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

                              Originally posted by Alibaba Group
                              Are we allowed to talk about replacements?
                              Eh. What is there to talk about anyways. We don't know which account, so its moot. The odds of it being an account not posting is as high as the acquisitioner picking the same account.

                              Comment

                              • GE
                                FFR Player
                                • Apr 2006
                                • 5

                                #645
                                Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

                                Originally posted by Amazon
                                Wolves killed Apple obviously
                                Why do you say that? Sure they were town read by some, but a few, including me, were scum reading them. I would of tunneled today unfortunately, causing a mess of non sense for town and would have been misleading.

                                Comment

                                Working...