TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[Alibaba Group]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

"This is a possibility, but it wouldn't be a good play and doesn't make sense" is not a claim you're the Acquisitioner.

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

convertcase [You are only allowed to post URLs to other sites after you have made 5 posts or more.] net

Fixed. You should now be able to post URLs.

[IBM]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Well since my gimmick has been trivialized ill type like normal till i find a new one.

my point i was making was all this speculating about who the acquisitioner is at this point is almost pointless. my gimmick has nothing to do with it either. why would i go through the effort of doing that if i was just going to shed this name at the end of the day anyways and steal someone else's name?

[IBM]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

the best way to handle the acquisitioner is wait for their original name to flip, then look for irregular behavior that goes against the norm established today.

[Facebook]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Well since my gimmick has been trivialized ill type like normal till i find a new one.

my point i was making was all this speculating about who the acquisitioner is at this point is almost pointless. my gimmick has nothing to do with it either. why would i go through the effort of doing that if i was just going to shed this name at the end of the day anyways and steal someone else's name?

May i reccomend typing in a specific font or something. I would see such a thing fitting, if used with the correct font. Remember to like this post to show support for this idea.

[Alibaba Group]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Well since my gimmick has been trivialized ill type like normal till i find a new one.

my point i was making was all this speculating about who the acquisitioner is at this point is almost pointless. my gimmick has nothing to do with it either. why would i go through the effort of doing that if i was just going to shed this name at the end of the day anyways and steal someone else's name?

I think I lost my draft of my post, but I figured out what you were trying to say anyway. It's WIFOM that invites unnecessary attention onto Acquisitioner-you for Day 1 for little gain. The point was that Apple's contention you had more scum equity for it than town equity was wrong. Do you see what I was saying now?

Either way, thoughts after catching up.

I came off page 10 with the impression IBM was surprisingly villagey. I think wolves typically outthink themselves on being agreeable and hold fast on things that don't make sense, hence the surprise, but their willingness to call out widely townread users suggested that the attitude was genuine.

I don't really know what to make of posts like "this is lazy" right now though. I mean, I agree it can be discarded easily, but I don't think Amazon is a wolf for posting it (the read on Microsoft). Microsoft made a bizarre driveby calling out another user for inactivity, there's a strong attitude implicit in that and it's fair to want to examine it, and I guess it's either towny entitlement or just a very awkward wolfy-popin. Microsoft made an implied wolfread on McDonalds that I am kind of a fan of as well.

Disney, Shell, and Apple were my top villagers. I thought Amazon was generally towny but I couldn't really understand some of their ideas. For example, saying someone is contributing but ignoring them is a good idea. I understand why, but don't agree the conclusion had any merit. Maybe I am more tolerant of people posting in alt caps.

I don't understand why nobody called out UPS's popins (Amazon might have done it implicitly). I am not sure posting gimmicky once or twice a day to avoid phantom is better than NAI non-existence like Marlboro's, which did draw comment.

[Disney]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

yo was ibm scared of apple saying their posting style was actually a possible scumtell using actual goddamn game mechanics to back it up
that's hot
alibaba is semi-ok now
switching to walmart for reasons previously stated

[IBM]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

yo was ibm scared of apple saying their posting style was actually a possible scumtell using actual goddamn game mechanics to back it up
that's hot
alibaba is semi-ok now
switching to walmart for reasons previously stated

Not in the slightest

I just found it was pointless since my gimmick was easily replicable so it defeated the purpose of it.

[IBM]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

working on something atm that will post in the colors of the rainbow

its not as easy to do as alt case posting though

[Shell]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

You mean like this?

✧

[FreezinIce]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

You mean like this?

✧

by the gods

[Shell]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

by the gods

Oh, hello! Would you like to buy our products?

✧

[Amazon]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

working on something atm that will post in the colors of the rainbow

its not as easy to do as alt case posting though

I made something to randomly color all the characters in my posts a while back. I planned to use it for a big claim post. Never did. Your best bet is doing something like

r,b,g = rand(0-255)
if sum(r,b,g)<[value you determine is sufficiently high to make it appear colored]
goto r,b,g =

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

I AcTuAlLy WrOtE My OwN JaVa PrOgRaM To Do ThIs FoR Me So KiNd Of A BuMmEr ThErE ' S OtHeR OpTiOnS .

DoNt WoRrY By ThE EnD Of ThE DaY I ' M SuRe IlL FiNd AnOtHeR GiMmIcK To BaNk On .

; )

Hehe

Bank

[Wells Fargo]

Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

I am pretty ok thunderlynching anyone that's popped in once or twice and done nothing

Off the top of my head, Toyota, McDonalds, UPS

Almost certainly a few more that I just don't remember