TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

[Hakulyte]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

I thought we were tomorrow today, nvm.

[Hakulyte]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

Just got caught up. I gotta go for a little over an hour but there's a fair bit on mellon/haku that I wanna look at when I'm back.
I'm inclined to think Mellon is town, but we'll see. I've played two (3?) with her as wolf and each time all she did was drop in once or twice a phase with some thoughts and get dismissed to fly UTR. She's actively posting and reads pretty genuine so far, so I'm leaning her town.

My head hurts because you're taking a stance while telling us that you didn't really look into it much.

[AragakiAyase]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

Oh ffs AA I wasn't cherrypicking. I literally quoted the quotes relevant to where you were acting weird and said why I thought they were weird. You're accusing me of cherrypicking because I didn't include inD's answer. Idc if he answered yes, no, or "I think you're the moon", I care about the behavior you exhibited in the parts that I quoted, which is why I quoted them.
I'd still like an answer to the previous question btw

also want to respond to this

It sure looked like cherry picking, because based on how you framed your post it seemed like I was asking a redundant question in "do you think I'm pocketing you?"

I think I'm starting to scumlean AA. The more I read his progression here the weirder it feels to me.
Immediately responding with "I've done this before" to dismiss inD's suspicion looks like he thought about that before saying it in the first place, and the repetition of "do you think I'm pocketing you?" also strikes me as odd because there's really only one obvious answer to that, and it was implied as a definite possibility of inD's "unnerving" comment.

when in fact it actually wasn't, as indheart's response shows

your read was on page 1 at 80ppp

i don't think you're pocketing me with it, no

do you see where I'm coming from?

[AragakiAyase]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

... Again, how? If I wasnt going to push you, you asking me to would force me into making a push I didn't believe in, which would lead to contradictions that you could exploit.
And if I was going to push you, then your post is meaningless drivel designed to make you look like you're generating info

to elaborate further on this, how you react to me saying this can also be telling

didn't get too much out of it this time though

[AragakiAyase]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

my d0 is weak and I think you're both capable of fooling me for, at minimum, the length of d0

I'm more confident that jrodd is town than you, but I'm often wrong on him early

I see

can you talk more about why xel's thing about V feels forced? what would you expect from town xel?

[AragakiAyase]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

feels weird to be having a solid townread on haku this game

[AragakiAyase]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

is there anyone townreading V? does anyone have a read on meno?

[mellonxcollie]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

1.) Humans have no reasons to project town because they're humans.
2.) The 3 quotes I picked are indirectly projecting town.
3.) Why are you projecting town in these quotes?

Wolves and humans equally want to avoid being mislynched, so everybody in this game wants to project town. Do you think my projections of humanness seem fake or something? That's one thing but you haven't even mentioned that. It's obvious that any player would try to project town.

In this game I am town so that's why I am projecting town. You want me to come into this game and tell a bunch of lies???

Anyways it seems like you are just too lazy to come up with fake reasoning against me so continue to ask me all you want why I am projecting humanness like it isn't the most obvious question in the world

[AragakiAyase]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

shado what do you think of the rest of my posts that you don't seem to be focusing on?

[Hakulyte]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

Wolves and humans equally want to avoid being mislynched, so everybody in this game wants to project town. Do you think my projections of humanness seem fake or something? That's one thing but you haven't even mentioned that. It's obvious that any player would try to project town.

In this game I am town so that's why I am projecting town. You want me to come into this game and tell a bunch of lies???

Anyways it seems like you are just too lazy to come up with fake reasoning against me so continue to ask me all you want why I am projecting humanness like it isn't the most obvious question in the world

[mellonxcollie]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

Nice self portrait, haku

[thesunfan]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

I see

can you talk more about why xel's thing about V feels forced? what would you expect from town xel?

its not really what I would or wouldn't expect from xel, its not something that I think most people say without it being forced

V is... concerning or whatever the exact words were don't really feel genuine. Yeah, V hadn't posted much, but concerning is a pretty broad word, especially to put at the end of a short thought like that. He hasn't really seemed too concerned by V either.

[thesunfan]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

is there anyone townreading V? does anyone have a read on meno?

I think V could be a wolf if I'm wrong on Xel
he hasn't posted much at all and that's getting to be more and more of his wolf tell

[ShadoWolfe]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

Back for 30-40mins

[Hakulyte]

Re: TWG CLXIII: Allies and Adversaries 2 - GAME THREAD

I'm bored.

-----

Raeko's Meta - The Guide

Step 0: Stay utr, but post genuine enough looking things.
***: Ignore Variations unless forced into talking about something.
**: If under pressure, post more so players think you're town.

Variation #1

Step 1: Mention you don't understand.
Step 2: Make other player explain.
Step 3: Repeat step 1.

Variation #2

Step 1: Mention you don't understand.
Step 2: Make other player explain.
Step 3: Explain something different from initial situation, but still related.
Step 4: Mention you don't understand based on Step 3 new element.

Variation #3

Step 1: Change topic to something everyone agrees will make sense.
Step 2: Explain how Step 1 is a true statement to get back some legitimacy.
Step 3: Go back to Variation #1 or Variation #2.

Repeat all 3 variations until

A) Everyone gets bored of seeing same shit over and over.
B) Other player fails to deliver undeniable proof. (hint: there's no proof in a game of assumptions until card flips)