TWG 150: Undertale

[TWG Alphys]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

Alphys did you ever explain your vote on Kid at eod?
I don't remember it being discussed very much but I'll look back

Not when i made the vote, I said start of this phase I was in a rush because i lost track of time and voted kid to force a 3-way kitb

[TWG Alphys]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

Whats wrong with those posts again?
Im literally just throwing out things that should have been on everyones mind anyways so that we can talk about it. I thought it was helpful. Hoping to spark a good discussion on the wagoners. Not trying to change the course of anything that is happening thus far.

Same reasoning for this post?
vvvvvvvv

Ill say this...if sans is a monster, there is def a human on that wagon.
If sans a human, there still could be a human on current wagon, but mostly monster.
Most definitely flaws in this but it could serve as a rough framework.
I agree the wagon looks ez like a $5 hooker

[TWG So Sorry]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

Once again, what is wrong with that post? Flowey and alphys have both called attention to it, and im really not seeing the problem. Maybe cuz im skewed to my own ideas, which of course makes sense. If someone could explain their view without using my quoted posts to explain it, thatd be great. Or at least provide some useful insight. As far as thats concerned, the current remarks arent helping further anything. You guys are making me talk in circles

[TWG Alphys]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

I'm asking if your reasoning for the last post was the same as the reasoning for the first two

[TWG So Sorry]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

The reasoning is the same. I am just shedding a light on potentials that deserve some thought.

[TWG Alphys]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

So instead of saying you're thinking a certain thing on a specific player, you're just saying, yeah sans could be a human or he could be a monster and then saying you kinda agree that the wagon looks easy. It's a neutral stance on the top human right now with an agreement statement that makes it look like you made it just so people don't think you're disagreeing with them on the possibility they'll look at you next.

[TWG Napstablook]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

Yeah yeah, I wasn't advocating a lynch on him unless there wasn't a clear decisive target by the end of today. I'd rather see someone who isn't posting who has the potential to be a human go over someone who is at least generating content and driving discussion.

The lack of spaghetti is weird. I can't imagine mouse giving it to an inactive, so chances are one of these things is going on:

1) Mouse is not in the game.
2) Mouse got roleblocked.
3) Mouse gave a human spaghetti and they are not admitting they got it.

I think you leave out a few scenarios:

4) Toriel was Mouse
5) Toriel got spaghetti

Not when i made the vote, I said start of this phase I was in a rush because i lost track of time and voted kid to force a 3-way kitb

Ah yes you did indeed say that.

Once again, what is wrong with that post?

The only thing I'm seeing, and someone touched on this already, is that it's just you saying a lot of words without actually doing anything. It's easily looked at as a white noise post.

[TWG Napstablook]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

[QUOTE=TWG Napstablook;4420196]4) Toriel was MouseQUOTE]

This is probably wrong given the monster flip, but I was thinking that full-flips weren't on and it was alignment only.

[TWG Alphys]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

4) Toriel was Mouse

Wouldn't she flip that way if she was?

Ah yes you did indeed say that.

Not saying it's a completely valid reason since the vote could def be seen as shady as people have already pointed out, was just rushed since weekends are stressful. i'm trying to be more active the rest of the game

[TWG Alphys]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

This is probably wrong given the monster flip

pls

[TWG So Sorry]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

So instead of saying you're thinking a certain thing on a specific player, you're just saying, yeah sans could be a human or he could be a monster and then saying you kinda agree that the wagon looks easy. It's a neutral stance on the top human right now with an agreement statement that makes it look like you made it just so people don't think you're disagreeing with them on the possibility they'll look at you next.

Yes, its a neutral stance because i dont have any reads. Just some scenarios to think about in conjunction with sans.
There was also no agreement statement, just neutral. I dont care if people start prodding me, it would help me with the game and formulation.

[TWG Papyrus]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

i'm taking the phantom tonight tbh, i have no time to catch up

[TWG Mad Dummy]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

My only wariness about the sans train right now is how easy it is. I know I blasted his ass into space but the amount of people hopping onto him like flies on a carcass is crazy

I understand the wariness, but Tsunderplane summed it up somewhat just before, you have to ask yourself if the way that Sans has responded to the pressure makes sense if they're a monster (it shouldn't) or if they're a cornered human (it should).

[TWG Mad Dummy]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

The lack of spaghetti is weird. I can't imagine mouse giving it to an inactive, so chances are one of these things is going on:

1) Mouse is not in the game.
2) Mouse got roleblocked.
3) Mouse gave a human spaghetti and they are not admitting they got it.

in the unlikely event that the third scenario is happening, the mouse should claim

[TWG Mad Dummy]

Re: TWG 150: Undertale

With how this game is progressing, I want to speculate that Doggo is town.

WHAT?!