TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

oh shit I forgot about rex

[Red Blaster]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 25 (9 members and 16 guests)
AragakiAyase, Charu, DaBackpack, Gradiant, MrPopadopalis25, Red Blaster, roundbox, rzr, YoshL

post, or have you given up?

get off my dick

[roundbox]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

Why? It's not like you are going to listen to anything I have to say anyway. You all already have your minds made up granted that choof claimed cop and dbp claimed sk, which by the way is a really convenient claim for two people to make considering there are two wolves left. Coincidence?

I haven't seen anybody claim otherwise

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

Why? It's not like you are going to listen to anything I have to say anyway. You all already have your minds made up granted that choof claimed cop and dbp claimed sk, which by the way is a really convenient claim for two people to make considering there are two wolves left. Coincidence?


lol wut

this would be really awesome actually

but no

[rzr]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

I haven't seen anybody claim otherwise

I also pointed it out too, but we're missing some members here
remember what I said about Zenith/Rex possibility

[roundbox]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

oh shit I forgot about rex

I don't know man, I'm not really feeling rex as scum here
Even looking at him with the Zenith slot I'm still not getting that vibe

[rzr]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

If it is it's AA and Round then. And don't give me that "Oh I've been townreading them all game.." Yeah you've been townreading them all game and yet humans are dying left and right..maybe it's time you reevaluate some of your town reads because they are obviously wrong.

well that would just suck because everyone will just listen to them and lynch me

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

reiterating that i'm not shooting anybody if we mislynch

[AragakiAyase]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

Why? It's not like you are going to listen to anything I have to say anyway. You all already have your minds made up granted that choof claimed cop and dbp claimed sk, which by the way is a really convenient claim for two people to make considering there are two wolves left. Coincidence?

then where are the other claims? the problem with this scenario is that it collapses if there happens to be anything that contradicts one of the claims

[roundbox]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

I also pointed it out too, but we're missing some members here
remember what I said about Zenith/Rex possibility

I guess
He could still be concealing a role. His claim was oddly placed but I don't see a PR/wolf zenith risking that d0 hammer

[Red Blaster]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

I haven't seen anybody claim otherwise

Maybe because we don't have a cop and there would be no reason for a SK who's actively trying to counter dap's claim?

[roundbox]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

Maybe because we don't have a cop and there would be no reason for a SK who's actively trying to counter dap's claim?

so does this mean you think DaBackpack/choof are a scum team?

[AragakiAyase]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

if dbp is a wolf here then his meta is forever changed

but there's no way he is because you know what would fuck over the fake cop/sk claim scenario? a vigi claim (even if it's by an SK in your scenario). everyone but rex has checked in at this point

[AragakiAyase]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

and there's no vigi claim

so do you think rex has a killing power?

[Red Blaster]

Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread

so does this mean you think DaBackpack/choof are a scum team?

It's either that or that dap is lying about which anti-town alignment he is. The latter would probably be the more likely scenario, but I'm not ruling the first option out.