Re: Who is the best rhythm gamer you've seen in your rhythm gaming career?
generally, if you think something is a "waste of time" and don't want to look like an idiot, contradicting yourself and posting again in this thing you think is a waste of time is counterproductive. though, if your goal is to look like an idiot, keep participating in a discussion you've previously declared you're walking away from.
and, so far, you're the only person with a complaint, and part of it stems from definitions only you use.
no one else here has had trouble comparing players across rhythm games. the criteria aren't explicit, but they're easy enough to discern: combined percentile rarity for multi-game analyses and absolute percentile for single-game analyses. for both, difficulty of percentile matters as well -- way more resources are invested in being the top 0.1% at football than in being the top 0.1% at FFR, and this extends to music games, since some games will have less competition for the top spots than others.
generally, if you think something is a "waste of time" and don't want to look like an idiot, contradicting yourself and posting again in this thing you think is a waste of time is counterproductive. though, if your goal is to look like an idiot, keep participating in a discussion you've previously declared you're walking away from.
and, so far, you're the only person with a complaint, and part of it stems from definitions only you use.
no one else here has had trouble comparing players across rhythm games. the criteria aren't explicit, but they're easy enough to discern: combined percentile rarity for multi-game analyses and absolute percentile for single-game analyses. for both, difficulty of percentile matters as well -- way more resources are invested in being the top 0.1% at football than in being the top 0.1% at FFR, and this extends to music games, since some games will have less competition for the top spots than others.
Comment