Okay, I follow through your logic here on this. This claim by Pit in your opinion would then be launched in a DESPERATE attempt to save a fellow partner? That would be the only reason for initiating a fake claim right?
If Pit is trying to save a partner, clearly it isn't Villager since Pit just voted for Villager.
Who is Pit trying to help out since they are in a dire situation?
Okay, I follow through your logic here on this. This claim by Pit in your opinion would then be launched in a DESPERATE attempt to save a fellow partner? That would be the only reason for initiating a fake claim right?
If Pit is trying to save a partner, clearly it isn't Villager since Pit just voted for Villager.
Who is Pit trying to help out since they are in a dire situation?
Not just to save a partner. It wouldn't even matter if we mislynched today.
What matters is that we're getting ever closer to being able to win by force just with claiming roles.
And as long as there's 3 blues left in the pool, wolves cannot win this game without claiming.
I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING LEFT TO SAY CONCERNING THE LYNCH UNLESS PEOPLE SWITCH THEIR VOTES. THIS'LL BE MY LAST POST THIS PHASE UNLESS SOMEONE ASKS ME A QUESTION OR MEGA MAN STROGARMS ME TO VOTE SOMEONE.
MEGA MAN, FOR ALL THE WORK YOU'VE DONE THIS GAME, I DO THINK YOU SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO DECIDE HOW THIS GAME ENDS. BUT I THINK YOU'RE WRONG ON LINK/PIT. caps
Okay, the best thing we can possible do right now is no lynch, if the most votes on no lynch takes priority over less votes on a target, i.e. there's a no lynch if there's 3 votes for no lynch and 2 votes for a player.
Because as Dedede said it's best if we can get to a 5/2 situation, and skipping down to 4/2 isn't that big a deal but it's better to keep as many greens up for the wolves to potentially kill at night as possible.
Comment