TWG CXX: Villains United

[TWG Hades]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

he mentioned you by name twice...

[TWG Prince Hans]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

Yeah, he did, what about it? I read the same posts you did (and quoted them).

[TWG Hades]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

So why did you post this?

I mean with the statements provided, it could be used for Scars as well since he got a lot of flak. Actually, it could be used for anyone that has the pressure, so............

[TWG Prince Hans]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

Replace Hans with Scars. That's what I meant.

[TWG Scar]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

Captain Hook I have a villa lean but quit being a bad piece of shit just vote somewhere dude your behavior isn't acceptable play. You can vote on anything wolfy but the rule of day one is the rule of republicans vote early, vote often.

Cruella is V. Cruella is trying. V likes to wolf. Thoughts?

[TWG Scar]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

And yes I do realize that earlier I said that if Cruella was V I'd give them a villain lean but I have changed my mind after reading old games minus the last one

[TWG Prince Hans]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

Only that all this time I thought it was crazyjayde.

[TWG Scar]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

Could be, just a theory. Overly aggressive play like that is such a turn off and if it is V I'm gonna have to say that I'd have a pretty comfortable time calling him a likely hero

[TWG Scar]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

Pro tip if you're meta consists of defending yourself five times without votin for someone your meta is bad

My meta is not bad

[TWG Scar]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

Sort of messy sorry, going to bed now. The blank ones I will get to tomorrow, I promise. Don't have much for reds, as I'm focused on weird shit with people that could be green:

Auto - When you pointed out the contradiction by Clayton regarding saying about knowing who people are, I was interested. Wasn't aware that the first post you quoted was actually second. So you quote out of order to get shit on people and then disappear? Weird.

Captain Hook - Ignore Cruella/Scar business and say you're not going to post anything. Attempting to defend himself by saying the same stuff over and over even though it's not explaining anything at all and showing he's either not reading or not understanding anything he has read. Complaining about people not voting for hypocrites, laughed and quoted somebody saying voting for hypocrites is dumb when Hook got called a hypocrite back. Not to mention now you're whining about people 'not reading' when you have yet to do the same properly. Posting that people are jumping on you for not doing anything when it's brought up that people should vote for present people rather than inactives. Maybe you should do something then rather than complaining about it. I agree with Clayton regarding "His game is fearsome and defensive, which probably just means he's newish, but we don't have much else to go by", but I'm leaning hero rather than newbie, or better possibility, newbie hero. Reading through more, continuing to complain about people voting him and not making one effort to fix that. "At this point I feel like Sydrome may be a hero because he's been zero'd in on me", when I stated that I didn't have anything on anybody else yet because I wasn't home to read through the thread and write thoughts. More not reading when he's on people for 'not reading'. "It isn't 11 pages of content that is useful though. Some of it is some of it isn't. Every player has their own way of playing and dragging information out. Mine doesn't have to be the same as others." The thing is, you aren't doing any playing or dragging information out, so you can't talk shit on what's been going on because others have been able to do just fine with what we have now. "Do we not want to get inactive people active? I forgot, we're just supposed to let people fly UTR the whole game and literally not look at them at all." But you aren't really being active and you're getting mad at people for voting you. Later on acting like you are giving up and resorting to calling others lazy when they call you out on continuing to play like shit.

Clayton - Will get to tomorrow when I'm not tired, I promise

Cruella De Vil - Your "I swear I'm not evil" post is weird and when Scar calls you out on it, you vote for him. I don't think calling out odd posts is 'fishy'. Coming on strong and shittalking when attempting to defend, even though you are the one being called out for acting fishy. http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...&postcount=174 is kinda villainy to me though. I'm not sure yet, reading through more I'm more inclined to say villain (oddly), but still kind of null.

Darla - Thoughts regarding Sid and http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...&postcount=249 make me feel like you are a villain. Not for sure though.

Dr. Facilier - Switching votes and nothing else. Just two posts with nothing of value.

Gaston - Early on, switching votes around to people not posting, and that's it. No other words with it, just votes. Weird thing though, people you vote for talk a tiny bit after you vote for them, but they don't say much at all and then kind of disappear. Maybe you're a hero and you're on a newbie team? Put a vote on them to make them post and not be UTR but they don't know how to do much else? You're not really doing anything useful either though, so I'm still not sure.

Hades - Will get to tomorrow when I'm not tired, I promise

Jafar - Will get to tomorrow when I'm not tired, I promise

Maleficent - Will get to tomorrow when I'm not tired, I promise

Prince Hans - "Didn't know I should be shit smearing on someone with literally no flip presented" Kinda weird. What else are you supposed to do? There's no flips presented for anybody. So are you just wanting to do nothing? Agreeing with Yzma about not discussing a variety of stuff this phase. Seems to hurt us rather than the heroes imo. Not really seeing what you are when you say Cruella is leading.

Randall Boggs - Gave excuse for being absent for a bit, said you didn't like Hans, and then nothing else. Just the two posts.

Scar - Will get to tomorrow when I'm not tired, I promise. I can say now though that I think he is a villain.

Shan Yu - Slight villain read due to posts like http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...&postcount=215. Not doing much of anything else as I see but nothing fishy compared to others currently.

Shere Khan - YOU HAVEN'T POSTED ANYTHING AT ALL. Even TWG Canada has done more than you.

Sid Phillips - Contradictory. Saying voting on Hook is unproductive and siding with him. Later telling Hook to shut up about what's going on regarding him and arguing with Hook about his hypocrisy playing. I agree with you now currently though rather than how you started out. Villain for now.

Syndrome - Villain

The Queen - YOU HAVEN'T POSTED ANYTHING AT ALL. Even TWG Canada has done more than you.

Ursula - States Scar is jumping over minor stuff and votes for him, but doesn't explain what the minor things are, no backing. "I don't know if Clayton is a human or a wolf but man his posts are A+ so I probably won't vote for him today. Thin wolf lean just for his behavior." HOW? Make post like http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...&postcount=263 when you are doing the same thing.

Yzma - "Gut feeling for hero between Cruella and Scar, if there is one, would be scar" I know you said gut, but is there anything that is making you lean more scar? Anything you could say to somewhat back it up would be nice. http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...&postcount=148 is dumb. Your explanation of that post is big and fancy, but reading it through, doesn't seem all that smart and still has a bigger chance of harming the villains rather than heroes.

Bahahah this is exactly what I do as a wolf facing pressure. At least they're seemingly listing stuff as thin but it feels weird to have stuff to say about everyone so early on. Good to read in case syndrome flips and what their alignment is

[TWG Scar]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

How could you have missed what Scar was jumping on people for? When someone pinged him out he flipped out it was obvious you don't need me to break out a magnifying glass just to find that shit. I don't have to prove my work for 2+2=4

I'll give you that on Clayton though; not too much on him other than tone + I don't see him pushing a hero agenda atm; obviously could change. Also his posts are hilarious.

This is so level 0, please show me the flip out. Planting some overexaggerations in the thread is not a good look

[TWG Hades]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

Why would the possibility of him defending someone else make any difference? How does that change the fact that he chose to defend you?

[TWG Scar]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

Okay I trust Captain Hook, Hades, Clayton and Gaston so far.

I want to know the identities of Cruella and Syndrome to formulate better reads there. What do you have to lose not sharing considering character kills are off? Ursula can do this as well.

Based on who Cruella is and if there is a hero between Cruella and Ursula I would still want to kill Ursula. Look at them saying a lot without proving anything and then immediately resorting to name calling and intimidation factors. Big bad egos in this game are gonna get shot down

[TWG Hades]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

That was in response to Hans.

[TWG Prince Hans]

Re: TWG CXX: Villains United

Why would the possibility of him defending someone else make any difference? How does that change the fact that he chose to defend you?

It doesn't, I'm saying that the same statement can be used for anyone else that has been pressured for a bit.

If you want me to go further, then fine.

I think that's a cop out statement. He used it to drag me along because I was also getting pressured, which is why I said he could be latching on to me to try to pocket me or make me a clear target later if I'm around.

Why am I getting this "trying to hard" vibe from you?