TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

wow ur lucky ur not in waterloo right now or i would soooo go back to campus and slap you

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

Go back and read all my posts for this game.

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

There is no logic anymore behind these accusations on me other than people getting super annoyed by the amount of posts I make. At this point, I have nothing more I can say unless someone other than me gives a sober second thought.

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

off to bed, i will tomorrow.

i still wanna see a vote count tho

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

I should have posted more in detail. There is a priority of the people I want to lynch FOR DAY 1.

Horrible inactive players and horrible players in general < Horrible players that give us information about better players when they are flipped < Potential wolves.

And keep this in mind while you read my posts. This has been my motivation for my actions in the past two games.

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

3 votes to insta on myself.

yoman as an alternative. great i see vic right now, and it just takes 2 more people to retardedly vote without reading the thread.

enjoy your trail of dead ends.

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

im off to bed

[Crazyjayde]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

Your motivations are legitimate, your approach is debatable.
By the way, if a player cardflips red because of a lynch, that's because he was suspected as a potential wolf from most players. I mean, if you want to get info from someone upon cardflip, you are kind of obligated to aim for potential wolves. One goes with the other. I don't see the need of putting both in the equation. It's actually one of the main aspects about having alternate day phases in TWG. If not, we could play a game where there would only be one phase and just kill everyone off of our suspicions. It's called genocide.

I'm TRYING to find wolves unlike any of you know how to do that.

Derp.

[Crazyjayde]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

Yo Manti, don't forget to post.

[DarkManticoreX2]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

Yep, A lot of reading to catch up on, and I want to go to bed before 2.

[Crazyjayde]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

I'm not talking about a weak player's defensive behaviour of the players who post. I'm talking about lynching the people who's posts do not logically make sense. Note: zoshi, vic, james.

The people making constant pushes will generate enough content in the thread for us to be able to analyze as the game progresses, so lynching them day 1 does not make sense since we do not have much information readily available.

If I could have, I would have replaced "defensive behavior" for "actions" btw. I understand your view on the strategy, but my argument on it was that, as of D1, even though weak players can give some essential hints based on their post content, I don't see why this information would be as valuable and satisfactory than a wolf who is being active, pushing in some general directions and getting some accusatory statements done. I actually feel like it's quite the contrary. Someone who has brought more stances into daylight gives us a better base for analysis and can point to numerous evidences. I feel this is only part of the excuse for lynching weaker players, and is not rational. You're actually saying "hey let's lynch someone without having much evidence". Zoshi, Vicc and James are prime example of that, and don't bring anything substantial enough to be considered illogical, really.

you realize that posting a paragraph of notes, some of which is within V's argument, implies that you are putting that information behind your vote, yes?

Other than V being certain that cedo is a wolf as a starting point on why I chose to analyze cedo, and specifically cedo, my vote had nothing to do with V.

As much as I love your posting style, there is evident contradictions in your arguments which you fail to acknowledge or deliberately decides to ignore. A failure of comprehension can happen in a good number of ways, often caused by things like language barrier, past experiences or different mindsets. I believe that a real pro-town player would try his best to understand his reasoning flaws even though they might not seem apparent at first. A wolf would divert attention from this. Thing is, I don't understand why you are so inclined in extrapolating others' but seem to ignore yours. (see upper quote)

And by the way, do V and you have any personal issues? That confrontation seems over the top.

If someone says I am all over the place one more time I'm seriously going to lose it. A lot of my efforts have been undermined and I need to change this mentality right now.

You know, thing is most of your explanations are scattered throughout the thread and do not always take form in one continual thought. What confuses me is how you switch from being accusatory to defensive to emotional really quickly.

I am so pissed right now I don't know if I should respond to you jrodd or just leave.

That type of shit really pisses me off. If you don't feel the need to contribute, you're not any better than a wolf.

-
That's all for a second sober opinion on the current events regarding you.

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

Based on this response, your point of view is that you don't care whether or not I am lynched? I have a response based on how you answer this.

[Crazyjayde]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

Please explain to me what demonstrates your point of view.

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

It's a simple question. You should answer it.

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

I wrote up 2 responses based on how you answer this question. I'll paste the appropriate one.