Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see
Oh and don't go away like you didn't acknowledge the discussion, cedo.
Oh and don't go away like you didn't acknowledge the discussion, cedo.
-
-
Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see
VOTECOUNT: Day 1 (ends Monday 8 PM EST)
freaky (2): dance, TPS
cedo (2): V, jayde
V (1): cedo
TPS (1): freaky
James (1): viccica
viccica (1): yoman
AC1 (1): jrodd
5 votes to lynch
yet to vote: Manti, james, zoshi, AC1
Comment
-
Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see
Not sure how I should take this remark.Comment
-
Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see
No seriously, I'm nobody's alias, just a fresh newcomer.Comment
-
Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see
If you were pnt that would be praise
If you were rzr that would not be.
I have no opinions so far. Cedo's vote was lazy, Jayde's vote on V was odd and seemed abnormal, but since normal hasn't really been established yet for Jayde... i don't know how to take it.
V's active, TPS seems okay
Yoman intrigues me. 2 or 3 votes and he was getting pretty emotional. I'm leaning toward a wolf kinda freaking out in his first game back in a while, but the read is weak and needs to be reviewed in the future.AAA's = 800
Originally posted by VComment
-
Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see
Nobody else was interesting.AAA's = 800
Originally posted by VComment
-
Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see
True, but that doesn't necessarily make freaky's idea invalid. In certain ways, his idea borrows from both schools of thought which you quoted.
and then the second one:One school of thought is that kills narrow down the pool of suspects, so any player that is not less likely to be scum than random should be fair game for being shot.
Anyway, I agree that we shouldn't get distracted with a plan which can't get off the ground. If everyone wants to start a "second" lynch pool, that's fine. If not, we should move on.This school of thought advocates only shooting players who are likely to be scum (or even whoever the Town collectively dictates should be shot)Comment
-
Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see
Liking the activity early on here. I'm not leaning heavily for/against anyone based on the reax we've seen, but the value of these reactions will really add up. Lots and lots of time to deliberate each day phase, which is pretty rad.
Keepin' the votes flying. Here's hoping for a dramatic entrance from
ZoshiComment
-
Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see
can i get a sticky for this most important of threads?Comment
-
Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see
In regards to the matter of a second voting pool, although I fail to comprehend every aspect that could benefit us from directing vigi/SK kills, I still like the idea of creating coordination in a game where it is supposed to be limited.
There might be some examples throughout the game where its application will be more pertinent, in parallel to the importance of the vigi kill. I say let's put this idea at hands' reach.Comment
-
Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see
I'm not sure why we dropped the yoman thing. I don't know how many game's he's played in, but he has to "figure out" frivolous d1 voting and fit in with it, that's a pretty clear red flag.Comment
-
Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see
*if he has toComment
-
Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see
Hello Boys and Girls!
Class: gooooood mooooorrrrrniinnngggg Mrrrrr. Zooooooshhhiiiiiiiiii.
Today class we will learn some Maths!
Who knows what 2+5 is?
J-rodd: Is it 6 sir?
Zoshi: Nope!
James May: 5 sir?
Zoshi: Nooooo!
V: Is it 25 sir?
Zoshi: err, nope, nice try though!
Manti: According to my calculations the answer is 7 sir.
Zoshi: Did you use a calculator?
Manti: uhm maybe
Zoshi: uh k
YoManImAwesome: the answerrr iiiiisss BACONNN!
Class: Bwahahahahahahahahhahhahaha
Zoshi:
, YoManI'mAwesome, To the NAUGHT CORNER!!!!
Class: *gasp*
Comment
Comment