Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)
I think people are confused as to how the process for suspicious scores works. Even if you have someone that has some type of "game" going on to "connect the dots", you still need physical evidence for action to be taken.
I noticed the correlation in Rubix's case, but all the lost replay data is what really slowed everything down. I've talked to admins about this (Velocity and aperson), so I know that this is needed even if I've made good points.
I think people are confused as to how the process for suspicious scores works. Even if you have someone that has some type of "game" going on to "connect the dots", you still need physical evidence for action to be taken.
I noticed the correlation in Rubix's case, but all the lost replay data is what really slowed everything down. I've talked to admins about this (Velocity and aperson), so I know that this is needed even if I've made good points.





Comment