Super Smash Brothers Brawl

[korny]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

Well i'll be online at that time anyway so i'm sure that'll be fine. There are A LOT of people wanting to play me tomorrow though, so there might be a chance where you'll have to wait a bit.

[zidart]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

Well i'll be online at that time anyway so i'm sure that'll be fine. There are A LOT of people wanting to play me tomorrow though, so there might be a chance where you'll have to wait a bit.

is ok.. that's what basic brawl is for

[korny]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

Not that i care but on the item matches are all of them going to be turned on?

[zidart]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

Not that i care but on the item matches are all of them going to be turned on?

well that's kinda the point of it...

and the offitems one will be played on final destination right?

[korny]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

I was just wondering that's all. And i guess we can do the itemless on all final destination. Battlefield and a few others will work too though. I don't really care.

[Squeek]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

Latias/Latios and Kat/Ana have never killed me.

The most effective Assist Trophy is Lyn since she has the potential to 1HKO you. Almost all of the other ones suck.

My point, that nobody has answered yet, is why you think items shift the balance of power so much that a noob can beat a "pro" 100% of the time just by picking them up.

[korny]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

100% of the time is a bit much. I'm just saying that a noob can beat a pro while if they played without them they could NEVER beat a pro.

[zidart]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

100% of the time is a bit much. I'm just saying that a noob can beat a pro while if they played without them they could NEVER beat a pro.

well what if 3 noobs team up to beat the pro??? even in a 4Vs4 battle the random element is there

[korny]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

Was that even a serious question? If so, I have no comment because it's an extremely stupid question.

[zidart]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

Was that even a serious question? If so, I have no comment because it's an extremely stupid question.

it wasn't serious but it coul happen...

[korny]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

I think it was a serious question and you're now trying to cover yourself up. I'm good at detecting sarcasm and there was none in your post.

[zidart]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

I think it was a serious question and you're now trying to cover yourself up. I'm good at detecting sarcasm and there was none in your post.

well your sarcasm detector doesn't work with foreigners then (sarcastic) i hope this helps.

[Squeek]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

Wow OK.

Your argument has become completely nonsensical now.

In every professional sport, the ability for a complete novice to beat a professional is always existent. Not often will it happen, but it will happen. There's even a television show for this exact situation called Pros vs. Joes. And there are times where the Joes will beat the Pros at their own sport.

I know I reference it a lot in this regard, but we also have Poker. Professionals don't always win. In fact, since there are so few professionals and so many novices, the odds are in favor of the novices. Why? Because you can have all the skill you want, but luck is still there.

Basically, by removing items from the game, you've turned it into a fake competition. Congratulations, I'm glad you finally admitted it.

You just said that a novice will never beat a professional in Super Smash Brothers if you remove items. That means in 100 matches against 100 different people, the one professional will always win. That means the way you play the game is broken.

GG.

[korny]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

Haha what the **** ever dude. It's not broken. It just means i can prove myself time and time again.

[ckj846]

Re: Super Smash Brothers Brawl

lawl oh noes tourney whore no all out battlez onli 1 v 1 fd no itemz.

O_o