I guess i'll be in, but the 4 stock thing is wwwwwaaaaayyyyy too long... 3 stock is what the pros use, so why shouldn't we use 3 stocks?
Higher stock counts increases the chance that an anomaly won't cause someone to win when they're not the more skilled player. If it was up to me, I'd say that matches should have even higher stock counts.
You obviously don't know what you're talking about because "pros" use 4 live stock.
Dude, you say that pros play with 4 lives with no items on ultra-neutral stages like Final Destination...that's not up to you to decide. There are things you do that I believe make you a poor player. But I don't say you aren't "pro" because of it. I play matches with 1-6+ stock, and does that make me a noob for doing so? No. Using 4 stock is NOT what all pros use. I like to use items. Does doing so make me an unskilled noob? No. Don't give us a definition of pro, because there is no solid definition for "pro". It's all based on opinion.
That's why i said "pro". As in there is no real definition for pro. Pro was referring to tourny regulars who play by the standard, 4 live stock with no items on neutral stages. Chill
Comment