TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

[DarkManticoreX2]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

The problem were having isn't something adding another game is going to fix. If people are going to be inactive, the game will die, and there isn't a thing we can do about it. Basically, With the aTWG, you're making another TWG game, and calling it something else. If the case comes where both games become inactive to the point of cancelation, but there are still players who are willing to be active and play, We simply cancel the current games, and host a new TWG for the players who are going to be active and play.

[rzr]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

See, that's where my conflict with the original ideas came in. How is it fair to the current host to cancel the game they worked so hard to create and get the players to enjoy? And whatever happened to enforcing phantoms other than 'oh you died because you have too many'.

[DarkManticoreX2]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Phantoms are like this rzr

1 - 0.001 vote
2 - 1.001 vote
3 - game ban and replacement

[rzr]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Yes, I know this. But in my game the game banning aspect of phantoms are ineffective. Nonetheless, I would like us to decide on this soon. The games are getting boring, I'd like to have them revived.

[Makilaz]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

They're not ineffective in that they prevent the inactive from playing again for a while. Eventually, most of the people who insist on being inactive get banned, and you're left with actives.

[pntballa18]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

panel votes yea or nay

[thunderstrike687]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

i vote lets play some ****ing normal games with less **** in them k thx

[Brilliant Dynamite Neon]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

It's been agreed on that next TWG will be pretty much standard.

I say 16 players, 4 wolves with 1 MW, Seer and Guard. Nothing complicated at all.

[Makilaz]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Voting nay. To rzr's idea, to be more specific.

[roundbox]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

i vote lets play some ****ing normal games with less **** in them k thx

This

There's a certain level of whether the characters control the game of the gameplay elements control the game, and now that gameplay elements (items and gratuitous amounts of powers) seem to be "favorable", they're just over complicating a simple game.

Something else that can be done to this inactive issue is to host a game with smaller player amounts. For example, we ride a couple of people short nearly every signup due to our small amount of active players, so why not adapt to this? Create games oriented at a smaller group of people, rather than hitting the 17-22 zone. 14 seems ideal to me.

nay @ rzr

[thunderstrike687]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

I agree 100% on smaller games. more focused, and it forces the chosen players to be active. I feel we should reduce the number of players per game, and issue game bans to any inactivity on the players in any game, because we will be forcing some to not play. This way, if you sign up and take someone elses spot and make someone else not play, you know you are going to recieve a game ban for obstructing another more deserving player from playing the game.

EDIT: oh yeah, nay at rzr.

[rzr]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Regardless of ayes and nays the problem is everyone's finding something to do i.e. Brawl and those who aren't are in here voting or dead in their own game. Mak, be more specific how? Ask me a question so it'll be easier for me to elaborate.

[rzr]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Either way I'm afraid I'm going to have to stick to jTWG for a while. I love playing with the vets but as I can't access AIM as often and the junior players seem to be more understanding.

[travman301]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Sorry rzr, I just don't like the idea. nay

[rzr]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Doesn't bother me, I just want to get a game going already ><