Re: United States eventual future?
First of all, before you come here to post again, keep in mind that this is CT; an area specifically for high-level thinkers. Its really easy to just copy paste links from an outside source. You need to give me something to argue about, other than whats on Wikipedia. What I'm trying to say is, those are solid facts. I'm not going to sit here for an hour and and try to argue against an encyclopedia.
Now.
Firstly, the United States was not involved in this. This was the work of the United Fruit Company, which was not affiliated with the US government.
Also, I don't see anything here about the United States trying to take control over Latin American trade.
It does go into talking about the "exploitative influence" that UFC was accused of, but it dosent say anything about influence over trade.
First of all, before you come here to post again, keep in mind that this is CT; an area specifically for high-level thinkers. Its really easy to just copy paste links from an outside source. You need to give me something to argue about, other than whats on Wikipedia. What I'm trying to say is, those are solid facts. I'm not going to sit here for an hour and and try to argue against an encyclopedia.
Now.
Maybe because the United States has a history of interfering with the economies and trade of other nations.
Cases in point:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit
Cases in point:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit
Also, I don't see anything here about the United States trying to take control over Latin American trade.
"The Company had a deep and long-lasting impact in the economic and political development of several Latin American countries".



Comment