TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

[pntballa18]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Good pointo manti, would you like me to come up with this basis for you and post it?

Also, I have a LOT o f friednds who will be interested in playing. I'm setting them up accounts as we speak and will host a jTWG for them. rzrgirl and a few others should probably start there. It would be basic like manhunt or something.

I'll make a jTWG host signup then, to see if anyone wants to oppose you.

[rzr]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

How's that?

30+ players

MUST POST AT LEAST 10 TIMES THROGUHOUT THE GAME. UNLESS YOU DIE FIRST DAY.

20-30 players
1 day/night- minimum of 3 posts, 1 relevant
2 day/night- minimum of 5 posts, 3 relevant
and so on

15-20 players
1 day/night- minimum of 2 posts, 1 relevant. Like you could make a joke out of one and a vote on the other.
2 day/night- minimum of 4 posts, 2 relevant.
3 day/night- minimum of 6 posts, 3 relevant.
And so on.

10-15 players
1 day/night- 1 posts, relevant
2 day/night- 3 posts, 2 relevant
And so on.

10 players or less
at least 5 posts throughout the ENTIRE GAME
If you die then don't post obviously.

[flawofhumanity]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

The thing about that is posts don't always equal activity. I could be very active via AIM and not post very often, or I could be a conservative poster and post all my important information via one huge post. The problem with setting up a set of rules is there will always be exceptions or special circumstances.

My suggestion would be to make everything regarding activity a matter of public opinion. For example, here's a situation that comes to mind:

XXX is inactive the whole game. He is either replaced/killed.
At the end of the game, the host, who is preferably very involved with the going ons of his TWG recommends which players (if any) should be banned. After this, each person who was elected for a ban should have a base time period to post (preferably 2 or 3 days) in their defense. When this time passes, the "TWC" reads the posts and decides which users should be banned, and for how long via votes. (as an example, 2-3 votes would garnish a ban)

This system seems pretty damn bureaucratic, but in the ends it's barely 5 minutes of 5 people's time.

Anyways, that's my proposition with inactivity.

[rzr]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

What if a person is defended by **** players. Like (no offence) mattc16 defends litodude (no offence). Then the **** defenderes defend an inactive player, and the good one's convict?

[flawofhumanity]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Er, that's the reason not everyone is involved. The host would have to elect the players as inactive, and then the person (and only him) would present evidence that he was not, or concede that he was. Based on the information provided by the 2 parties, then the "jTWC" or "TWC" or whatever would vote between themselves on whether or not the ban should go into effect, and if so, for how long.

[rzr]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

I like, I like. I say the jTWC or TWC should vote that publically though so the person can defend individual points. Like trav says "you only posted about what your eating fro dinner, I vite you get a 2 game ban" and the defender says "I was not! i was hungry"

Bad analogy I know lol

[pntballa18]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

So basically WGP, exactly what I said, in a lot less words

[travman301]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Also guys, you can't judge a person's worth in this game by the amount of posts they had.

A person can easily post. "Oh yeah, he has a good point", but it doesn't make it a worth while post.

So when regarding inactivity, its simply up to the players that are involved in the game to judge as called for.

[mattc16]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Honestly, I've had enough of TWG. I've been in and out of hospital for the last month or so, so i didn't have enough time to properly get on and make a post. I prefer talking about the game over AIM anyway, but i'm useless with it and don't know how to chat to people not on my buddy list.

Trav... as for your point about i didn't make a single post all game, how didn't i get a phantom then? I'm pretty sure i made a few posts.

Ban me, whatever, but i'm not playing again. The levels of play have decreased so much since all the vets left, and it's just no fun any more.

Bye everyone.

[rzr]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

That's why we're doing it on a basis of votes from the TWC

and hi matt, your viewing thread!

[mattc16]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Congrats, and i also made a post.

[rzr]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

There's a first time for everything =p

[rzr]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Done whoring this thread!

[travman301]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Honestly, I've had enough of TWG. I've been in and out of hospital for the last month or so, so i didn't have enough time to properly get on and make a post. I prefer talking about the game over AIM anyway, but i'm useless with it and don't know how to chat to people not on my buddy list.

Trav... as for your point about i didn't make a single post all game, how didn't i get a phantom then? I'm pretty sure i made a few posts.

Ban me, whatever, but i'm not playing again. The levels of play have decreased so much since all the vets left, and it's just no fun any more.

Bye everyone.

Matt thats not the point of this. We absolutely don't want you to stop playing.

It's just that you have been inactive for a few games now, and we need some kind of standard for inactivity.

I hope you will come back after two games.

[rzr]

Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc.

Matt thats not the point of this. We absolutely don't want you to stop playing.
I hope you will come back after two games.

This is why travman should have power here. If manti is mod then travman should have some sort of implied role, or even a direct one. He knows hospitality and empathy while enforcing the rules.