Quote:
Originally Posted by perkeyone
After reading about one and a half pages of this thread, I have come to the conclusion that about half of the posts have been made simply to give the illusion that the poster is intelligent. (They failed horribly in my eyes.)
|
I find it quite funny that someone would say that only to say,
Quote:
Originally Posted by perkeyone
An argument that on may have against this concept is that in order for it to be true then there would be an infinite past. An infinite past means that and infinite number of years have occurred, which is theoretically impossible. However, it makes sense to me when I change the perspective from "an infinite number of years have occurred" to " an infinite number of years are occurring".
|
immediately afterwards. There are more grammatical errors in that one paragraph than I dare to count.
Then you go on to state a bunch of theories that don’t even make sense at all. There is no scientific basis for any of it. It’s true that we don’t know what black holes are exactly, but we do know that not even light can exist within them. That means that they do not create anything. A universe cannot be a black hole, black holes only exist within a universe. It is theorized that they could connect universes, but that theory has little proof. It just doesn’t make sense to say that a black hole is a universe. Universes expand and contract, but they don’t become other things, as far as science can tell us anyway.
I have never claimed to know everything, but for someone as obviously inept as you to down everyone in a forum designated for higher-level thinkers... I love the irony of it all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eccles
What about cyclic universe?
that is at the end of the universe it will "go back" in time and create itself.
sounds strange, but in that option is avoids the questions
"what happened before the beginning?" or "how can something come out of nothing?"
and
"How could it exist forever in the past?"
so before the beginning was the end, but there was a beginning.
|
On a more serious note; this is a great idea. Well I like it anyway, that by no means makes it true. If all the dimensions are viewed as strings, why couldn’t they loop back on each other?
I don’t have anything to prove it, but Einstein believed in time travel and I know he was much more intelligent than I. Actually I'd like to discuss time travel for a bit. I want it to be possible, then everything could make sense. My only real problem with it is that if we can go into the past then it should be equally possible to go into the future. If one could go into the future then that must mean that the future is predetermined. I have the ability to go out right now and save a life, or I could take a life, I could even sit here and do absolutely nothing for the rest of my life. I don’t see how it could be predetermined when I have so many options. Yet this would validate the Theory that there are a bunch of dimensions parallel to our own they just branch off. And if everything is already set in stone why couldn’t it just loop back on itself.
I know this is a little scrambled. I just thought it all up, I'll try to put everything together and make more sense later I’m pressed for time at the moment. I know I have no solid proof so far, but look at it like the Big Bang Theory. I can’t prove it, but can you disprove it?