Damn. But if a Spread player AAAs an FMO song and a 1 hander AAAs an FMO song. Who is better?
The one-hander is more skilled relative to the limitations of his/her playing style, but in absolute, objective terms, both players have accomplished the same task, essentially setting them as equals. The difference is that whereas people will simply give the spread player a pat on the back, they will hail the one-hander as the greatest ever, due simply to the fact that the FMO AAA was...well...one-handed.
In any case, I think this concept has been elaborated upon already. : O
Hmm...to go along with the Hall of Fame, there should be a Hall of Shame. XD
Then again...that might be a bit too demeaning...: /
Hmm...to go along with the Hall of Fame, there should be a Hall of Shame. XD
Then again...that might be a bit too demeaning...: /
Isn't that what Dumbass of the Year is for?
Public AAAs: 229
Total AAAs: 260
Fc's: 363
Latest AAA: Toph's OP
Best AAA: Toph's OP
Avg Rank: 67
Tier Points:439 (408 + 31 for 264 AAAs)
Style: Spread
DotY has much more to do with forum stupidity, whereas HoS would incorporate more of the scores bs element. Not that we really need it, as I mentioned.
Not gonna happen.Obviously the one hander, but no. That's gay Rebirth, you need a like top 5 One handers, Spread players,Indexers and crap. /Wrist i hate you.
Originally posted by devonin
They've demonstrated equal skill. I'm getting sick and tired of this idiotic "If I play in a style that is personally -harder- for me to do well at, I must be good" nonsense.
Every style is equally valid, and every score should be considered only as a score, the style has no bearing on it.
If you -prefer- one-handed style, and elect to play that way because you find it easier than other styles, why should you get some imaginary extra credit over someone who -perfers- to play a different way?
If you aren't one of the -objectively- best players on the site, you shoudln't be included in a hall of fame for the best players on the site, its just that simple.
i've got to agree with devonin. any real HoF only has a list of inducted members... although within that list, they can be listed as to whether they were a player, a coach, a front-office person, an owner, a broadcaster, etc etc. clearly most would be players, but a few from the other categories would be appropriate as well.
in this instance, the game. but also SIU, MeTrivia, the forums, MP chat, Vid chat... as examples of other potential ways of getting in. but i'd say the standards would be much higher, maybe where you'd consider 10-15 for players initially, maybe 2-3 tops from each of the rest... then in the future, consider 3-5 for players each time with 1-2 from the others.
basically, like a real sports HoF. which, if you need information on, I know WAY too much about. my grandfather wrote a book about sports halls of fame.
Comment