Were we better off in a state of nature?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • lord_carbo
    FFR Player
    • Dec 2004
    • 6222
    #31
    Re: Were we better off in a state of nature?

    last.fm

      Comment

      • Kilroy_x
        Little Chief Hare
        • Mar 2005
        • 783
        #32
        Re: Were we better off in a state of nature?

        Originally posted by aperson
        3 months later and everyone is still responding to a bot
        He's the only one that posts topics with any degree of frequency.

          Comment

          • devonin
            Very Grave Indeed
            Event Staff
            FFR Simfile Author
            • Apr 2004
            • 10120
            #33
            Re: Were we better off in a state of nature?

            He's also not a bot, just a jerk

              Comment

              • KA0Z R4VR
                FFR Player
                • Feb 2007
                • 287
                #34
                Re: Were we better off in a state of nature?

                Lol, really? This should be closed by now. I think all our posts have proved our point clearly. Finally, Coberst made one good thread with out bickering and such.
                Originally posted by jewpinthethird
                Are you has depression? Does you worry about things that are worryful? Does you want to escape the Earths? Just remember, you has a spicy life.
                Originally posted by Zageron
                Everything is Vistas fault. If your cat dies, it's also Vistas fault.
                Originally posted by [TeRa]
                I've come to the assumption that you are either Miley Cyrus yourself being you are not a young kid trying to defend her, or you are indeed Chris Crocker, you related her to Britney Spears...If you took this paragraph seriously, just quit the internet lol

                  Comment

                  • tsugomaru
                    FFR Player
                    • Aug 2004
                    • 3962
                    #35
                    Re: Were we better off in a state of nature?

                    Originally posted by Kilroy_x
                    He's the only one that posts topics with any degree of frequency.
                    Unfortunately, Kilroy is right. Without Coberst, our CT forums would be a very deserted and boring place to be.

                    ~Tsugomaru
                    Originally posted by Hiluluk
                    WHEN do you think people die...?
                    When their heart is pierced by a bullet from a pistol...? No.
                    When they succumb to an incurable disease...? No.
                    When they drink soup made with a poisonous mushroom...? NO!!!
                    IT'S WHEN A PERSON IS FORGOTTEN...!!!

                      Comment

                      • devonin
                        Very Grave Indeed
                        Event Staff
                        FFR Simfile Author
                        • Apr 2004
                        • 10120
                        #36
                        Re: Were we better off in a state of nature?

                        Considering that any actual useful discussion that comes from his threads generally has nothing to do with the actual topic of this threads, and certainly has nothing to do with any input from him, any credit he gets is purely incidental. I could copy/paste random text into the forum all the time and figure on some number of them resulting in useful discussion too.

                        Though Kilroy is right that people need to start threads more often.

                          Comment

                          • Relambrien
                            FFR Player
                            • Dec 2006
                            • 1644
                            #37
                            Re: Were we better off in a state of nature?

                            Originally posted by devonin
                            Though Kilroy is right that people need to start threads more often.
                            I would start more discussions, but due to my lack of time and the decidedly-philosophical nature the forum is heading toward, I'm mainly just able to read rather than participate. Philosophy is not something I am at all strong in; I prefer debates on more "tangible" things.

                            I'll see if I can think of something though.

                              Comment

                              • devonin
                                Very Grave Indeed
                                Event Staff
                                FFR Simfile Author
                                • Apr 2004
                                • 10120
                                #38
                                Re: Were we better off in a state of nature?

                                Who said anything against tangible things? The "more philsophical bent" of the forum is a result of Coberst posting pseudo-intellectual bull****. I'm glad to move away from it, frankly.

                                  Comment

                                  Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                                  Working...